By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cerebralbore said:
Chazore said:

So you're basically saying that if it can be played on two, then it's not somehow exclusive, despite the fact that you cannot play it on the other two systems. Also you're basing M#9 for anything that's ever been/will be funded?. Yes SC isn't out yet, but that doesn't take away the fact that it has been funded many millions, millions that put it within the AAA area.

Could you reword your first question so it's not a triple negative? I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say with it. For all I know Star Citizen could wind up being epic, and with high enough production values to put it squarely in AAA territory.

I'm asking on a game being non exclusive when it's able to be played on 2 out of the 4 systems vs a game being played on only one system out of the 4, but apparently you put so much focus on the tone of the question rather than answering it.

You tell me of negativity coming from my end, but I snesed negativity from the Star Citizen part when you sued M#9 as a prime example, yet we don't even know the end result of what will happen with SC, so using the worst case scenario didn't exactly ooze positivty either. 

Have you been watching the project over time in general, to know how it's coming along and what exactly is being put into it?.



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"