monocle_layton said:
I see many people (including I) expecting the game to score at least a ninety. After looking at BotW and seeing the five years of its creation, I think there will be a rather wide gap in reviews ranging from the low seventy's to close to one hundred. Here is the logic to my thinking. I have bolded the main points for convenience.
1) Long wait
2) Lack of Wii U exclusivity
3) Poor DLC execution
4) Differences between Wii U and Switch
5) voice acting and open-world gameplay
|
1) Comparing to FF15 is pointless. A game announced in what 2006 and thus a 10 year wait to a game with a 5 year wait from waht I've heard people say. And that 5 year wait I feel like is from last game release and Nintendo just saying we are workign on a new game, not from first seeing it.
2. Didn't hurt the TP game. Just looked at MC earlier today and saw that TP has like a 97 or something like that
3. A reviewer shoudl judge a game on what it is, not what it could be. Plus hundreds of games have way worse dlc practices and those are never brought up in the reviews
4. THe differences are minimal, besides the score woudl only affect the Wii U version, not the switch.
5. Reveiwers have been asking for VA forever, why would this hurt it? Also they have been askig for OW forever, again should not help it unless its as baren and Skyrim or something. (though skyrim did get great reviews)
But look at teh Zelda reviews. Even the more controversial ones still get like 92-93 in scores.
