fatslob-:O said:
RolStoppable said:
The easiest method to find out is to ask directly. There are three major races: Caucasian, mongolian and negroid.
Is there a race that is superior to negroid?
|
Going by your originated terminology you also missed Australoid and Native Americans "races" and they genetically significant populations according to Noah Rosenberg ...
VGPolyglot said:
OK, let's ask. Do you find whites superior to blacks?
|
"Whites" and "Blacks" ? LOL, don't take me as someone who is feeble minded enough to fall into those simplifications. If you meant Sub-Sahara African or European ancestry then your question becomes more plausible ...
@Bold I could ask you both the same question as well but since this is not a one way relationship I may ask the reverse as well ... ("Is there a race that is superior to caucasoid" ? "Do you find blacks superior to whites" ?)
I've also got another question for both you, what do guys believe to be defined as "superior" with respect to one or another population ? How would you guys go about benchmarking humans while statistically aggregating the result too ? Just what exactly are the performance metrics for "race" ?
|
VGPolyglot said:
fatslob-:O said:
Going by your originated terminology you also missed Australoid and Native Americans "races" and they genetically significant populations according to Noah Rosenberg ...
"Whites" and "Blacks" ? LOL, don't take me as someone who is feeble minded enough to fall into those simplifications. If you meant Sub-Sahara African or European ancestry then your question becomes more plausible ...
@Bold I could ask you both the same question as well but since this is not a one way relationship I may ask the reverse as well ... ("Is there a race that is superior to caucasoid" ? "Do you find blacks superior to whites" ?)
I've also got another question for both you, what do guys believe to be defined as "superior" with respect to one or another population ? How would you guys go about benchmarking humans while statistically aggregating the result too ? Just what exactly are the performance metrics for "race" ?
|
So, you refuse to respond to a question as simple as that.
|
Because your question can't be answered with a simple yes or no and not because he is a racist.
Some races have higher IQ, on average, than the rest. Some races have bigger tools, on average, than the rest. Some are longer, some are shorter etc. So fatslob can't answer your question with a simple yes or no. No matter how inconvenient it is, if we are going by a determined metric, some race is superior than the rest (again, on average). I disagree with Fatslob a lot and I think his approach to any discussion can be too mathematical. But peddling racial statistics, that some might find inconvenient, doesn't make one racist.
I think the only time I thought he was going too far when he was arguing that having a higher IQ means you're superior to others and that you'll achieve more in life or something. But looking at the questions he asked you above, he seems to acknowledge there are other metrics to go by, therefore, he wasn't able to answer your question. So even if I detected hints of racism in his opinion in the past, it doesn't mean he holds the same opinion right now. Behold the power of the free-market of ideas! Who knew It could change people's minds!
Pro tip: a racist will never change his mind...