I know, right?

It could actually deliver 10 tsar bombs like nukes in a single blow, and it has counter-measures against every single anti-missile defense know to man.

If one of those is used, the Fallout alone would probably make life miserable for all mankind for a long time.

How would you even test something like that?

Let me remind you that all the other countries nuclear arsenal is pityful when compared to Russia and the US.

But he said "I rather work with Russia, get along, we can fight ISIS together".

She said: "We will put Russia in line or take them down".

He wants peace with Russia, she wants to kill their ally Bashar Al Saad.

Let me remind you that all the other countries nuclear arsenal is pityful when compared to Russia and the US.

The one thing you do not do is to piss off Russia.

16 people who have had access to the nuclear codes said they don't trust Trump with the codes.
He's the one who repeatedly asked "If we have nukes, why can't we use them?" three times during a 1 hour meeting with a foreign affairs minister.
And he's the one who said he wouldn't rule out nuking Europe. And didn't know what the nuclear triad is, etc.

Like I wouldn't trust a todler to be in control of a bus, I wouldn't trust this imbecil with something he clearly knows nothing about.

Hilary may be for aggressive foreign politics against Russia, but that doesn't mean nukes.

I know Obama, a fun loving, cool guy, did a lot of stuff by executive decisions, things that are anticonstitutional. I wonder what a murdereous, war loving, bloodthirsty, well know as evil, woman will do in his place.

Specially one that said she WANTS to take down Russia.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-supporting-syrias-regime-what-changed-17738

On August 14, Guan Youfei, a rear admiral in China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, visited the Syrian capital of Damascus, escorted around the city under heavy guard. Guan’s visit reportedly included meetings with senior military officials and Russian officers, as well as pledges that the Chinese military would provide medical training for Syrian medical staff. The question is why China is increasing this engagement now.

Admiral Guan’s engagement contrasts with previous Chinese behavior during the Syrian crisis. While China has been one of the few powers to maintain an embassy in Damascus throughout the current crisis, Beijing’s engagements have been fairly limited, and mostly focused on attempts from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to insert itself into peace negotiations and occasional expressions of concern around individual nationals who appear on the battlefield (either as hostages or fighters). The approach has been driven by a mix of motives, including Beijing’s long-standing principle of “non-interference,” aversion to what China sees as largely Western-led regime change in the guise of humanitarian intervention and a Chinese desire to insulate its growing economic interests in the Middle East from the continuing consequences of the Arab Spring.

That dynamic may now be about to change. China has started to become a participant in the many international discussions around countering terrorism, and ISIS in particular. China has participated in the Global Counterterrorism Forum and hosted sessions about terrorists’ use of the internet, while engaging in discussions at home about contributing more to the fight against ISIS. Last year, a decision was made to alter national legislation to allow Chinese security forces to deploy abroad as part of a counterterrorism effort, and China has sought to establish overseas bases in Djibouti. In neighboring Afghanistan, it has established a new sub-regional alliance between Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan and China to discuss and coordinate the fight against militancy and terrorist groups in the area. All these actions highlight the degree to which China is slowly pushing its security apparatus out into the world in a more aggressive posture than before. Seen within this light, Admiral Guan’s visit to Damascus is another piece in this puzzle, and the most ambitious yet in many ways for a power that has historically preferred to play a more standoffish role in addressing hard military questions.

Looking to the Syrian context in particular, there are two major reasons for China’s apparent decision to begin playing a more forward role in engaging in Syria. One is China’s concern at the numbers and links of Uighur militants from its restive province of Xinjiang participating in the Syrian conflict. The other is its desire for geostrategic stability in the Middle East as it seeks to consummate its “One Belt, One Road” strategy.

Of particular importance on the first count is the presence of the Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) on the Syrian battlefield. TIP is a successor organization of sorts to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), a group that Beijing has blamed for violence linked to Xinjiang after 9/11. Beijing has claimed that Al Qaeda directly “funded and supported” ETIM, and while the scale of Al Qaeda’s direct support of ETIM has been widely disputed, the relationship between TIP and Al Qaeda has only grown closer since, with TIP garnering more Uighur recruits from 2009 onward and Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri praising Uighur contributions to the global jihad in a recent message.

You are only labeled as a criminal if you've been judged as one by the court. Otherwise you are not guilty until proven otherwise. Seems the US has a lot of self labeled judges running around. I'm getting really sick of this.