I'll never understand America's obsession with war, death and weapons.

There is no nuclear war that will result in this. Stop with the extreme hyperbole. Every election we get the same crap, "Candidate A didn't win which means we're DOOOOOOMMMMEEEEDDDD". With the amount of times we'd be in nuclear war if this were hypothetically true, the world would not exist and human life would have been extinct before the 1960's. The political figure you wanted to represent your country didn't win, that is all.

Polls from yesterday, from 270towin:

If people vote as the polls show, this is the result.

Depends how accurate the polls are I guess.

lmao... how da hell is Syria important to China again? You people just write whatever your imagination lets you to.

Yes, but it is not trolling neither flamebait, just opinion. Also, everyone is being nice to each other, so, be cool  ok? No need to ban anyone, specially me.

Please...

No fucking way. The biggest nuke ever tested, the tsar bomba, couldn't do that. Not even close. Source? Cause I would love to see a how many megatons this thing is purported to have. There is no theoretical limit to how big a single blast could be, but there are logistical problems, as well as a general lack of sanity and reason.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-supporting-syrias-regime-what-changed-17738

On August 14, Guan Youfei, a rear admiral in China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, visited the Syrian capital of Damascus, escorted around the city under heavy guard. Guan’s visit reportedly included meetings with senior military officials and Russian officers, as well as pledges that the Chinese military would provide medical training for Syrian medical staff. The question is why China is increasing this engagement now.

Admiral Guan’s engagement contrasts with previous Chinese behavior during the Syrian crisis. While China has been one of the few powers to maintain an embassy in Damascus throughout the current crisis, Beijing’s engagements have been fairly limited, and mostly focused on attempts from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to insert itself into peace negotiations and occasional expressions of concern around individual nationals who appear on the battlefield (either as hostages or fighters). The approach has been driven by a mix of motives, including Beijing’s long-standing principle of “non-interference,” aversion to what China sees as largely Western-led regime change in the guise of humanitarian intervention and a Chinese desire to insulate its growing economic interests in the Middle East from the continuing consequences of the Arab Spring.

That dynamic may now be about to change. China has started to become a participant in the many international discussions around countering terrorism, and ISIS in particular. China has participated in the Global Counterterrorism Forum and hosted sessions about terrorists’ use of the internet, while engaging in discussions at home about contributing more to the fight against ISIS. Last year, a decision was made to alter national legislation to allow Chinese security forces to deploy abroad as part of a counterterrorism effort, and China has sought to establish overseas bases in Djibouti. In neighboring Afghanistan, it has established a new sub-regional alliance between Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan and China to discuss and coordinate the fight against militancy and terrorist groups in the area. All these actions highlight the degree to which China is slowly pushing its security apparatus out into the world in a more aggressive posture than before. Seen within this light, Admiral Guan’s visit to Damascus is another piece in this puzzle, and the most ambitious yet in many ways for a power that has historically preferred to play a more standoffish role in addressing hard military questions.

Looking to the Syrian context in particular, there are two major reasons for China’s apparent decision to begin playing a more forward role in engaging in Syria. One is China’s concern at the numbers and links of Uighur militants from its restive province of Xinjiang participating in the Syrian conflict. The other is its desire for geostrategic stability in the Middle East as it seeks to consummate its “One Belt, One Road” strategy.

Of particular importance on the first count is the presence of the Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) on the Syrian battlefield. TIP is a successor organization of sorts to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), a group that Beijing has blamed for violence linked to Xinjiang after 9/11. Beijing has claimed that Al Qaeda directly “funded and supported” ETIM, and while the scale of Al Qaeda’s direct support of ETIM has been widely disputed, the relationship between TIP and Al Qaeda has only grown closer since, with TIP garnering more Uighur recruits from 2009 onward and Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri praising Uighur contributions to the global jihad in a recent message.

I'm not going to ban you for having an opinion. However, I will say if you ACTUALLY believe we'll have nuclear war from her. Then either you do not know the extent of the presidents actual power or you're just wrong

Actually this isn't the first time... 

Although not a week before though lol.  Basically, here in the United States, you can make a judgement call by looking a polls on the state/county level and then since we have an electoral college system, you can add up the points and see how Trump get to 270.  Also early voting has begun so you have actually live data.  Based on who many registered voters there are you can  look at the avalible paths to victory (as a comobnation of states), combine that with recent polling and extrapolate from previous turnouts.  its not a dificult concept.  This reminds me of the 2012 election.  Just before we had similar data and Obama was projected to be the most likely to win.  It panned out exactly as the pollsters predicted because they have imporved their research to the point that they are getting mroe and more confortable with their predictions.  Nate Silver is the one who most recently vindicated proper data based polling aggregation as a means of making solid probablicistic predictions. 

The Tsar Bomb is very old news.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/us-news/2016/10/29/russia-unveils-satan-2-missile-reportedly-wipe-texas-speed-past-us-missile-defense-systems

Here is a report from Hillary´s favorite outlet, CNN

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/26/europe/russia-nuclear-missile-satan-2/