By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The Nintendo NX Seems Like It's On Track For A Delay?

Tagged games:

 

Forbes report: Nintendo NX DELAY!

Just kill me already Nintendo. 41 27.52%
 
Oh! The pain! The pain!!! 20 13.42%
 
Don“t care. 62 41.61%
 
I love waiting. 26 17.45%
 
Total:149
Wyrdness said:
HyrulianScrolls said:

Comparing whether Pokemon or Mario is more widely known is irrelevant in this case because it was the AR aspect of Go that made it a phenomenon. Sure it needed a known brand name to really gain traction, but at the end of the day it didn't rely on the Pokemon name to become such a big hit. SMR however will be almost exclusively relying on the Mario name to become a hit. And I'm sure it will be very big, however I have high doubts about a Go type of success for it. Maybe something more like 400-500m downloads lifetime than 1.5b. 

Actually he's right in that the brand played a bigger part in Go's success because the same developer had a previous game that utilized the same AR concept and it never took off. The AR maybe the most interesting thing about GO but no doubt the brand is what made it successful.

Yeah it needed the brand to gain traction like I said, but that's not what made it a phenomenon. If that were true there'd be 500m people playing the actual games. I guarantee the percentage of people playing Go that never before played a pokemon game in their life is easily higher than the percentage that have. 



Around the Network
HyrulianScrolls said:

Yeah it needed the brand to gain traction like I said, but that's not what made it a phenomenon. If that were true there'd be 500m people playing the actual games. I guarantee the percentage of people playing Go that never before played a pokemon game in their life is easily higher than the percentage that have. 

The fact that it needed a brand to gain traction proves him right though as the studio's previous attempt using the concept never took off, the brand is what made it sucessful the's no way around that fact.



Wyrdness said:
HyrulianScrolls said:

Yeah it needed the brand to gain traction like I said, but that's not what made it a phenomenon. If that were true there'd be 500m people playing the actual games. I guarantee the percentage of people playing Go that never before played a pokemon game in their life is easily higher than the percentage that have. 

The fact that it needed a brand to gain traction proves him right though as the studio's previous attempt using the concept never took off, the brand is what made it sucessful the's no way around that fact.

Well there's a difference between people buying it because it is Pokemon (brand power) and the brand making the concept viable (the power of having a brand).  Pokemon being the IP in question definitely boosted it's appeal obviously, but I think any brand that gave it a real, recognizable face would have done fine.  It's just that when you look at previous AR games that didn't just lack a popular brand.  They lacked any "brand".  Ingress isn't just plain, it's downright nondescript.  No one denies PoGo owes some of it to the Pokemon brand, but not all of it.  It wasn't just people buying it because it's Pokemon.  I mean, there probably aren't even 100 million.  total Pokemon fans prior to Go so all 500 mil can't be prior Pokemon fans.  Not even close.  So it can't be "just buying it because it is Pokemon."  There's more to it than that.  And that more - the social AR aspects - are not present in Mario.  



Nuvendil said:

Well there's a difference between people buying it because it is Pokemon (brand power) and the brand making the concept viable (the power of having a brand).  Pokemon being the IP in question definitely boosted it's appeal obviously, but I think any brand that gave it a real, recognizable face would have done fine.  It's just that when you look at previous AR games that didn't just lack a popular brand.  They lacked any "brand".  Ingress isn't just plain, it's downright nondescript.  No one denies PoGo owes some of it to the Pokemon brand, but not all of it.  It wasn't just people buying it because it's Pokemon.  I mean, there probably aren't even 100 million.  total Pokemon fans prior to Go so all 500 mil can't be prior Pokemon fans.  Not even close.  So it can't be "just buying it because it is Pokemon."  There's more to it than that.  And that more - the social AR aspects - are not present in Mario.  

I'll argue it does owe it to Pokemon, lets say the are around 10m Pokemon fans around, almost all of them would have a smart phone and friends who own a smart phone as well. Those fans spread word to just 5 people each that 50 - 60m easy, that's brand power not just bringing in current fans but new ones, many people have probably heard of Pokemon but never tried it due to not being fully into gaming and PoGo was a chance to look into the franchise.

The concept is all good but the fact that both of you admit it needed Pokemon's brand to take off and find appeal pretty much proves his point in that regard.



Ruler said:
curl-6 said:

Honestly, I don't even care any more.

Nintendo have lost me. I was a fan for over 20 years, but modern Nintendo simply no longer meets my needs as a gamer. For years I defended them and made excuses for them, hoping things would get better, but I'm tired; tired of delays, tired of droughts, tired of being disappointed. 

It's time we went our separate ways.

its Nintendo, you cant leave them behind when they are almost dead like Sega

Nah, they are deader than Sega.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network

I really wouldn't be surprised if it gets delayed. But Nintendo are in a difficult situation. They are missing the holiday season this year, the PS4 Pro will be out before the NX and if they delay the NX til holiday 2017 they will have the Scorpio to compete with also as well as disgruntled Nintendo enthusiasts whom have been waiting so long. I know Nintendo doesn't really target the same audience that Sony and MS do but there is some overlap.