By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Worst movie you've ever watched

Miss Congeniality 2 - The very worst attempts at comedy I've ever saw. Sometimes a movie is so bad that it still makes you laugh (The room or Samurai Cop) But sometimes it's so bad it's painful, as it's Miss Congeniality 2's case.

The last airbender - For reasons that should be obvious.



Around the Network

I don't think I really have to explain...



Probably some abysmal sequel. Crow Salvation springs to mind.



Jack and Jill, Movie 43 or Bio-Dome.



I have seen a LOT of really bad shit, sadly. Not much of it my idea.

But the WORST, that WAS my idea (and the worst period), was Crank 2: High Voltage. It's not as if the first film was a good movie.....honestly, it wasn't. But the sequel? The only film I have yet seen, where it progressively got worse as the film went on. Every time I thought it had hit the shit apex, it upped it again. Horrible movie. Yet somehow, I sat through the whole goddamn thing, even though I at several points told myself I should turn it off. *sigh*


Worst movie I've seen in theaters? Probably Dragon Wars, or Birdman.



Around the Network
John19 said:

I don't think I really have to explain...

 

 

If the show had never existed, and that was just some oddball idea that Shyamalan had, I would have honestly thougth it was a decent film. Not great by any stretch, but a decent action/fantasy. However, the show DOES exist, and was amazing. The movie not only gets some key things wrong, but it also lacks most of the heart and humor from the show. The charactes were just kind of shells of themselves, compared to what they're actually supposed to be.

I don't think M. Night is a bad director, in fact I like several of his earlier films. But I think one thing he has proven he is not, is a big budget blockbuster director. He excelled when he was working on character driven stories, in a smaller scale. Like Signs, that was pretty good I thought, and it dealt with a worldwide alien invasion, but only focused on one family's experience of that. And that was for the best. With After Earth, which wasn't a BAD movie, it was just kind of bland, I think the original story concept would have made for a much stronger film: a father and son who were camping/hiking in the wilderness, the father gets hurt, and the son has to go for help. That would have likely been a nice, character driven drama. Instead, Will Smith wanted to turn it into a sci-fi epic, which simply isn't M. Night's forte.

But yeah, The Last Airbender wasn't great. And honestly, while I was originally exicted about, they never should have bothered trying to adapt it to film in the first place. The show was perfect as is, they even shirked the usual Hollywood mold, and purposefully only made it three seasons, with a specific, pre-determined beginning, middle and ending. Unlike most modern shows, which fly by the seat of their pants, have little consistency, and often feel like they have no real concept where they're ultimately going a lot of the time.



Garbage



                                                                                     

There are probably lots of bad movies I've gladly forgotton yet this one I remember
Rollerball 2002 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0246894/

Worst remake ever.



DevilRising said:
If the show had never existed, and that was just some oddball idea that Shyamalan had, I would have honestly thougth it was a decent film. Not great by any stretch, but a decent action/fantasy. However, the show DOES exist, and was amazing. The movie not only gets some key things wrong, but it also lacks most of the heart and humor from the show. The charactes were just kind of shells of themselves, compared to what they're actually supposed to be. 


I don't think M. Night is a bad director, in fact I like several of his earlier films. But I think one thing he has proven he is not, is a big budget blockbuster director. He excelled when he was working on character driven stories, in a smaller scale. Like Signs, that was pretty good I thought, and it dealt with a worldwide alien invasion, but only focused on one family's experience of that. And that was for the best. With After Earth, which wasn't a BAD movie, it was just kind of bland, I think the original story concept would have made for a much stronger film: a father and son who were camping/hiking in the wilderness, the father gets hurt, and the son has to go for help. That would have likely been a nice, character driven drama. Instead, Will Smith wanted to turn it into a sci-fi epic, which simply isn't M. Night's forte.

But yeah, The Last Airbender wasn't great. And honestly, while I was originally exicted about, they never should have bothered trying to adapt it to film in the first place. The show was perfect as is, they even shirked the usual Hollywood mold, and purposefully only made it three seasons, with a specific, pre-determined beginning, middle and ending. Unlike most modern shows, which fly by the seat of their pants, have little consistency, and often feel like they have no real concept where they're ultimately going a lot of the time.

Eh, I still think the movie wouldn't of been good even if the show hadn't existed. The acting was pretty bad, and so were the fight scenes. But because the show does exist, it really does make the movie a lot worse than if it didn't. I do agree that they never should of bothered adapting the show to live action, I just wouldn't see it working.



Probably every Disney sequel.



"Just for comparison Uncharted 4 was 20x bigger than Splatoon 2. This shows the huge difference between Sony's first-party games and Nintendo's first-party games."