By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Uncharted 4 is the best console-game right now, so the trade press =)

 

Uncharted 4, i play the

SP and MP of course <3 169 36.90%
 
Singleplayer <3 188 41.05%
 
Multiplayer <3 7 1.53%
 
see results 94 20.52%
 
Total:458
Aerys on 12 May 2016
Xxain said:
Aerys said:

Well MGS is behind U4 so...


And the game disappointed a lot of people who expected something in the line of MGS 3. The open world was a mistake imo and im not the only one to think that.

Though there was also a lot of great moments with Quiet.

 

But the best game of the generation,  maybe until i finish U4, is TW3.

I am extremely curious.

Why was anybody expecting something in line with MGS3? 

Or something in line with...Well MGS1/2 , MGS V is too much different, they should have sold it as a spin off because its nothing like the main MGS's games.

It's whole different game, less story centric and with characters and ennemies less charismatic with bad acting ( Skullface, biggest deception ever in a MGS), it also brings a useless open world giving a huge feeling of emptiness with a lot of repetitivity.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Around the Network
Wright on 12 May 2016

Well, it went down to 93% in Meta right now, so it's not the best console-game on metacritic at the moment. Bloodborne still can shine through this one!



Qwark on 12 May 2016

It just got a 40 from the Washington post



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Qwark on 12 May 2016
Wright said:

Well, it went down to 93% in Meta right now, so it's not the best console-game on metacritic at the moment. Bloodborne still can shine through this one!

Bloodborne has a 92 and perhaps the Washington Post will be removed because it is obviously a click bait review



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Teeqoz on 12 May 2016
Qwark said:
It just got a 40 from the Washington post

It's odd, because there already was a review from The Washington Post giving it 4/4 or 100.



Around the Network
Wright on 12 May 2016
Qwark said:
Wright said:

Well, it went down to 93% in Meta right now, so it's not the best console-game on metacritic at the moment. Bloodborne still can shine through this one!

Bloodborne has a 92 and perhaps the Washington Post will be removed because it is obviously a click bait review

 

True that. I remembered Bloodborne at 93 for some reason.



Mr_No on 12 May 2016
Teeqoz said:
Qwark said:
It just got a 40 from the Washington post

It's odd, because there already was a review from The Washington Post giving it 4/4 or 100.

You see?!? puts on tinfoil hat

That's what I've been saying the other day! They want to choose the scores they want to put in to maintain the status quo! They paid the trolling reviewer to make a bad review, so they could choose the most horrible one of the two.

Seriously though, this is really, really weird. If there was already a first review from the Washington Post, why would MC choose the worst review? And by worse I mean less professional and satiric. Only sense I can make of it is that they didn't know about WP already did a review and took the second one as the legit one, or it was on purpose. To keep the score low? Clickbait? Who knows.



Veknoid_Outcast on 12 May 2016
Wright said:
Qwark said:

Bloodborne has a 92 and perhaps the Washington Post will be removed because it is obviously a click bait review

 

True that. I remembered Bloodborne at 93 for some reason.

Doesn't Super Mario 3D World have a 93?



greenmedic88 on 13 May 2016
Mr_No said:
Teeqoz said:

It's odd, because there already was a review from The Washington Post giving it 4/4 or 100.

You see?!? puts on tinfoil hat

That's what I've been saying the other day! They want to choose the scores they want to put in to maintain the status quo! They paid the trolling reviewer to make a bad review, so they could choose the most horrible one of the two.

Seriously though, this is really, really weird. If there was already a first review from the Washington Post, why would MC choose the worst review? And by worse I mean less professional and satiric. Only sense I can make of it is that they didn't know about WP already did a review and took the second one as the legit one, or it was on purpose. To keep the score low? Clickbait? Who knows.

It's already been said, but call click bait for what it is. 

No, all reviews don't have to fall generally in line with one another, but when you do a little exercise that involves comparing the reviewed score for a universally acclaimed game against other games that received the same score (I believe the WP troll review was 40%), suddenly there is no defense for such a review. 

Show anyone a 40% reviewed game and say with a straight face that it's the same quality as something like U4. 



Rogerioandrade on 15 May 2016
DonFerrari said:
BraLoD said:

Metal Gear Solid V has a 93 on its most reviewd version.
GTA V was a 7th gen game ported to 8th gen.

Right now Uncharted is THE best reviewed game released for this generation.

And this is talking about exclusives, so having PC versions deny them this positition on this discussion.

Big deal. MGS still has 95 % for one of its versions and the fact that there´s a PC version doesn´t hurt the fact that it´s still a console game.