I hope everything will be true :)
| Dr.Vita said: I am pretty sure that almost every Activision game will sell bad on NX. Nintendo doesn't target the same audience as Activision. |
And wrong again
Dual Pixels and their source "Geno" is a phony. They've ran crap like Pokemon Plus/Minus which turned out to be laughably and entirely false.
http://dualpixels.com/2014/01/06/rumor-geno-provides-information-supposed-next-gen-pokemon-games-plus-minus/
Also the NX rumour they ran which they attributed to Geno was copy/pasted from a 4Chan board post from last December.
That's not to say NX won't get COD or whatever, it's just that I wouldn't put any stock in this particular rumour.
| JWeinCom said: Why would a Spider-man game be called "The First Avenger" O_o... Spider-man was not the first Avenger in any way shape or form. In the comics he became an avenger like 40 years after the team was formed, and in the movie universe he's joining three movies in. Also, "The First Avenger" moniker is already attributed to Captain America. Sounds odd. |
Exactly what I said earlier. It makes this whole rumour sound fake.
Darwinianevolution said:
Could that mean S/M would be moved to the NX, or that they will make a NX version of the game? Because I don't see GameFreak splitting the generations like that. |
Yeah I cold see that argument, but then again they did have all last year to work on the game so maybe they will be in similar styles to each other so the transition isn't as jarring. But that's just me speculating.
Well if the next COD really turns out to be called Bloodlines, then Ill listen...
| TheLastStarFighter said: I don't know if this rumor is based on fact, but I have no doubt whatsoever that Nintendo is targeting the western console market, core gamers and third parties with NX. They've said as much repeatedly, siting their failure to cater to the western tastes in the western dominated console market, etc. Nintendo needs third parties to truly succeed, and I think NX is going to attempt to right the wrongs of Wii U. We'll see if it can. |
They never said that or even hinted at it. Because they themselves just plain dont believe that nonsense.
elektranine said:
Sorry but Activision will do nothing to anger bungie. And the entire 10 year $500 million budget is cofunded by PlayStation. Why do you think PlayStation gets exclusive marketing, dlc, early dlc, early beta access, and bungie showing up at their press conferences. It could happen after the original 10 year contract ends but not before. |
It depends on the contract. I doubt that Bungie had a 'don't piss us off' clause in the contract. As you said, they're pretty much owned by Activision for the next 10 years. So they are the ones who decide what happens with them and Destiny 2. Sony is just a advertising partner on the first Destiny. Sony doesn't decide what happens with Destiny 2 either.
| bunchanumbers said: A complete version of the first Destiny would be a big seller for NX. I know I'd be there. |
Based on what exactly though? I didn't really hear Nintendo owners really kicking up a fuss when they didn't get original Destiny..
Guitarguy said:
Based on what exactly though? I didn't really hear Nintendo owners really kicking up a fuss when they didn't get original Destiny.. |
True. I only tried it because it came with my PS4. I wouldnt buy it.