The point I am making is that you are wasting your energy and pointing your finger at the wrong people here.
Whose fault is it that these things are censored? NoA who can do whatever they want because they are the only feasible option as distributor, or SE who can be a feasible option for unaltered content but seemingly refuse to?

Rumor is that "localized" version of Bravely Second completely lacks the story branch leading to bad ending. Probably because all the 30-something people who still care about nintendo in the west will be depressed into suicide attempt or something like that.

It's their choice on that and it's completely fair both gamers/the company. If the sales don't warrant it then why port it? That's why the PS3 lacked alot of japanese games. I don't hold that against any japanese dev/pub. If you think they are obligated to port a game in spite of a high risk for low sales then you're being entitled about it. You can also lay off the "blind" and "it says alot about yourselves". 

I don't like the majority of nintendo games and that's why I don't buy any of their devices. That could easily change if nintendo focused more on the older gamers and having a normal controller. That doesn't make me blind.   You're completely mistaken that I dislike nintendo, though. I'm indifferent towards 'em. I despise censorship though hence why I've been posting in any thread related to censorship and not the abundance of nx rumor threads. 

that's insane if true and anyone who defends this bullcrap are just as bad anti-consumer as the people who defend on disc DLC, season passes, and micro-transactions.

hell i'll go as far as to say this crap is worst freaking grahpical downgrades this is stuff that directly impacts gameplay.

Guys, guys. Square enix hired an Italian company called Binari Sonori to do the localization on the first game. There's virtually no Nintendo staff actually doing anything on these games that isn't handling the money or the marketing. And the second game probably is the same situation.

Here's the source:
http://www.siliconera.com/2013/12/16/heres-worked-bravely-defaults-english-localization/

They localized every dragon quest game when it stayed on Playstation, nintendo not so much. Dragonquest heroes allready sold Dragonquest X

You're so really sure that it's Nintendo which is guilty for this? I know that usually SE choose their own localization teams, and even if I'm not sure which was the localization team behind Bravely Second, I'm willing to bet that it's SE related. Also, SE did similar things in the past, for example:

This is for Mobius Final Fantasy, it's not really the same case but they toned down the model for the Japanese release, compared to the previous model. Too much skin. Not really censorship because the game wasn't released with the first character model, but it shows that they're willing to tone down some model characters if they feel they're not suitable.

Also, Bravely Default was censored, and this game is pretty much SE fault. 

And I really agree with BD censorship, by the way, 15-year old women in erotic outfits is totally disgusting. 

As I said, I don't really know which company was responsible, but jumping to conclusions so quick screams "bias" to me.

Who says they're not gonna port it if it can't be censored? That whole arguement that people won't get a port if a game is not censored versus if it is is complete scat. That wouldn't stop them from porting a game especially if the game has rating of teen or mature to begin with. In the majority of the gaminig markets, what they censored from the games wouldn't have affected their ratings if left alone.  If any of what you said was true then only zero percent of gamers would be playing GTA. 

That's not the topic. It's not about nintendo stepping in or not. It has nothing to do with this. Nintendo didn't have to censor the game in order to port it. 

The idiots that work on localization at Nintendo Treehouse need to be fired, let some non-extremists do that job so they don't censor the hell out of it.