padib said:
Aeolus451 said:
Since you're wanting to go with it like this, instead of actually debating or making a point, I'll play along. You're welcome, padib.
|
I really appreciate it though.
By the way, if it weren't for Nintendo, who did you have in mind that would publish it instead? What examples in the past do you have to support your argument?
And if Nintendo censors 0.1% of a game, but releases 99.9% of it, on a scale from 1 to 10, how happy are you? And if the game never came out, on a scale from 1 to 10, how happy are you?
That way, we can at last compare apples to apples.
|
Why wouldn't nintendo have published it? Why would someone else publish it? All I'm talking about is censorship. Nintendo doing the port or not doesn't have anything to do with it.
I repeat, I'm not saying that nintendo shouldn't have done the port altogether (not the topic) but how they did the port. When I buy a japanese game, I want a translated (maybe have english voice overs, too) japanese game. Not 9/10 of a japanese game. If i can't have the full game then why can't I have it? That's rhetorical btw. All nintendo has to do with a port is translate it. It's not that difficult. The west can handle japanese culture just fine. The majority of gamers are adults, therefore the censorship of games that are meant for adults and sneaky teens is absolutely asinine. It makes you wonder what they think of us when they walk on eggshells with their games/ports.