Art Book For Bravely Second Censored Outside Japan

[Aeolus451]

RolStoppable said:

Aeolus451 said:

Because they are not obligated to port every game released in japan. It makes perfect sense to only port games that are likely to sell well overseas. If gamers were gonna hold fault to any japanese gaming company for not porting a game then everyone of them would be guilty. It's ridiculous to hold any fault for not porting a game. Nintendo is porting games they think will do well overseas but they should just leave the game content alone except to translate or add in voices. They're trying too hard to be a kid's company. They should respect the consumer's choice if they want to play a game with whatever kind of content. One size doesn't fit everyone.

Seriously? So you would have sided with Nintendo during the whole Operation Rainfall incident where Nintendo of America decided to not publish three games (Xenoblade Chronicles, The Last Story, Pandora's Tower)?

I don't believe that for one second. Your dislike for Nintendo has made you so blind that you would now defend Nintendo for far worse things than some minor adjustments to a game and an artbook.

It's their choice on that and it's completely fair both gamers/the company. If the sales don't warrant it then why port it? That's why the PS3 lacked alot of japanese games. I don't hold that against any japanese dev/pub. If you think they are obligated to port a game in spite of a high risk for low sales then you're being entitled about it. You can also lay off the "blind" and "it says alot about yourselves". 

I don't like the majority of nintendo games and that's why I don't buy any of their devices. That could easily change if nintendo focused more on the older gamers and having a normal controller. That doesn't make me blind.   You're completely mistaken that I dislike nintendo, though. I'm indifferent towards 'em. I despise censorship though hence why I've been posting in any thread related to censorship and not the abundance of nx rumor threads.