padib said:
pokoko said:
If I were a collector, which probably who usually buys art books, then this would piss me off a lot more than the changes to the game.
Also, they LEFT IN the bits that actually WERE changed in the game? Now that's hilarious. |
If you were a collector, wouldn't you get it in japanese?
Aeolus451 said:
RolStoppable said:
Seriously? So you would have sided with Nintendo during the whole Operation Rainfall incident where Nintendo of America decided to not publish three games (Xenoblade Chronicles, The Last Story, Pandora's Tower)?
I don't believe that for one second. Your dislike for Nintendo has made you so blind that you would now defend Nintendo for far worse things than some minor adjustments to a game and an artbook.
|
It's their choice on that and it's completely fair both gamers/the company. If the sales don't warrant it then why port it? That's why the PS3 lacked alot of japanese games. I don't hold that against any japanese dev/pub. If you think they are obligated to port a game in spite of a high risk for low sales then you're being entitled about it. You can also lay off the "blind" and "it says alot about yourselves".
I don't like the majority of nintendo games and that's why I don't buy any of their devices. That could easily change if nintendo focused more on the older gamers and having a normal controller. That doesn't make me blind. You're completely mistaken that I dislike nintendo, though. I'm indifferent towards 'em. I despise censorship though hence why I've been posting in any thread related to censorship and not the abundance of nx rumor threads.
|
So you would prefer no content at all than content with minor changes.
Isn't that a case where your principles blind you from practical matters? Is it more important to keep the game exactly as is and not even release it or is it more important to release it? With absolutely minor censorship, at least the gamers get to enjoy 99.99% of the art of the game, in and outside the software.
If it were up to you, they would enjoy 0%, all for the sake of the 0.01% of content that just may be censored.
Mountain, meet molehill.
|
Who says they're not gonna port it if it can't be censored? That whole arguement that people won't get a port if a game is not censored versus if it is is complete scat. That wouldn't stop them from porting a game especially if the game has rating of teen or mature to begin with. In the majority of the gaminig markets, what they censored from the games wouldn't have affected their ratings if left alone. If any of what you said was true then only zero percent of gamers would be playing GTA.
