Let her get permission for carrying a gun and buy her a handgun, that's what I would do.

Or to restrict it in some way. Like only two seconds of  spraying into the eyes, or fully spray one eye only.

Its illigal to sell and own.. (and all danes know this.. becourse of it beeing discussed in the media many times.. and some years ago a big politicans got a fine becourse she said she had one)  Also all type of knives is illigal in the nightlife.. and if you carry a knives in daytime.. you should have a good reason.. (could be hunting or fishing.. or kitchen knives in packing)

But carring a peperspray is a very litle "crime" where carring a knives is a bigger crime and you can get some weeks of jail time (not first time.. that will also just be a fine)

Gotta throw in the "refugee" reference to get that media air time lol.

lol, so i was right.

She should be more progressive and let some random monkey rape her, yup.

Yyyyep. Let's ignore the trauma and long-term repercussions from rapes because clearly, that is the more logical solution ...

With that it's different if you knock the guy out he's no longer get a threat then the police come. If you tie him up and torture him or hold him at gun point and shoot when he's still and unarmed he's no longer a threat then it's no longer defence.

It's not really fair when they come into your house completely uninvited with intend to rob and at times intent to take your life, the moment they enter without your consent or the desire to kill you should forfeit their life, the act of trying to be fair to them shows that the system is warped ebcause in the old days when you robbed you got punished, when you killed, often you would be put to death, these days the justice system has warped itself in such a way that someone who kills more than 5-10 people can often live their entire life in prison or even get parole and connect back with society despite the lives they took. You cannot say to me with a straight face that the justice/law system is absolutely just and perfect because it honestly sin't in various ways.

A goverment deals with statistics not individual situations, because that's how you help the most people. If pepper spray being legal leads to more incidents where it's used as a weapon and permanently damages people than it leads to saving people, you have to make a judgement based on that.

I could just as easily ask you what the US goverment recommends doing if some asshole decides to pepper spray you into blindness because of a personal dispute.

999 time out of 1000 they're there to steal. You're allowed to use as much force as they use, that'd the usual self defence law. So if someone's stealing you're stuff and you attack and stop him, or if he attacks you and you beat the shit out of him that's fine. If he shoots you and you shoot him back that's fine. 

But if you've used the same force and elimated the threat they posed you cannot execute them. Or tie them up and hack their limbs off.

It's the same on the street if a guy pushes you, that's assault you can push or hit back but if you beat him within an inch of his life or hospitalise him from a push that's excessive force and you'll be charged.

Edit; who said the law is perfect? If the law was perfect new laws would never happen.