By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Would you mind if Nintendo went third-party?

 

Would you mind?

No, in fact I want them to. 71 28.86%
 
I'd be fine with it. 60 24.39%
 
I would. (Explain below). 96 39.02%
 
See results. 19 7.72%
 
Total:246
KungKras said:
oniyide said:
where is the proof that we would get only a few games, that makes no sense as they would have more resources, time and money freed up by NOT having to make and market a machine. We would get the games we would get anyway.

OT i wouldnt mind. I have no problem buying more than one console, but if Ninty stops making them i guess i would be buying one.

They would not have more resources because they would lose all the licensing fees from their platforms. Time? Really? The hardware engineers they employ would have more time making software? lol.



 

thats less time making HW and making games, thats just common sense. There engineers wouldnt be there no more. oh well. Licensing fees? from who? its not like 3rd parties are putting games on there home consoles anyway, so how much are they really losing?



Around the Network
RingoGaSuki said:
Would I mind? Absolutely, I'd hate it so much that I'd never buy another new video game again. You said that this would just be the home console and handhelds would be a different story, but they are inseperable. If you have Nintendo franchises on opposing consoles, but then still have the Nintendo handheld, the handheld would die even worse than the Wii U has. There would be no incentive to buy one, this is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard, quite honestly.

 

one could make the argument that is one of the reasons why Wii u is doing so bad, because there is no incentive to get one when 3ds exists. So how is that different if they just stop making consoles, they are seperable, thats why one is doing ok and the other is flopping.



Kagerow said:
There are... More problems than you can see...

Lets say that Nintendo suddenly goes third party. Than Nintendo actually gets more leverage on the console market.

For example, lets imagine the scenario where Nintendo suddenly declares that all of their home console title will be third party, and will only release on Xbox One.

This declaration, if it would happen, would rearrange current generation. Xbox One will quickly catch and possibly surpass PS4 because - well. All the Nintendo's current share will move with them, including additional share who wasn't sure Wii U would be a good deal.

Problem is that Nintendo have no reason to support Western console that is selling less and going to ignore them.

If Nintendo sides with Playstation, Already struggling Xbox will probably have to bite the dust.

That would result in single console dominated market without healthy competition.

Well, that is my take.

 

or they can just support both like damn near everyone else does...problem solved



Honestly I feel a bit frustrated about this theme going about Nintendo going third party. People don't make constantly topics about "What if Sony/MS whent third party" so I don't see why would you focus so much on Nintendo. yes, they have poor sales this generation, so ? Xbox was almost never profitable and Microsoft hinted various times that they might eventually exit the home console market since they own Windows while Sony due to their other divisions have lots of financial problems...



bunchanumbers said:
Aeolus451 said:
bunchanumbers said:
Aeolus451 said:

Hmmm you have a point. That's on nintendo though. They don't really make many new IPs this gen that aren't related to one of their main IPs. Nintendo could just become a bigger publisher than any of the others and work with studios to bring their games to people but still develope their own games. Surely, if nintendo fans spoke out, nintendo would listen especially since they're purely a video game company. 



Yeah, that's why Sega made Phantasy Star 5, or made Bayo 2 and Shenmue 3 happen. Once they go 3rd party its over. Do you really think they care what a vocal minority of gamers want when they are 3rd party? Those vocal minority sales matter to Nintendo now because they also buy consoles, peripherals and other Nintendo games. Once Sega went 3rd party they were done. The exact same thing will happen to Nintendo. Becoming bigger like you say means they need bigger sales to support themselves. They won't get those sales from niche nintendo games.



Sega is kind of a bad example even though it's the only console maker to go 3rd party. They're bad with money. Nintendo on the other hand isn't. If nintendo went 3rd, what games get sequels or what gets released largely depends on the people who buy nintendo's games. Nintendo's loyal fans is it's only market amongst gamers and it's games reflect their tastes. If nintendo fans start to demand things then most likely nintendo will have no choice but to cave in.  At some point, someone has to say "this shit isn't acceptable" or "we want this game". Nintendo has never been in a position that it can just ignore it's fans because they are it's target consumers. 

 

That is doubtful. If Nintendo is a 3rd party publisher most likely, we'll end up not getting any of their fringe games anymore, because they just aren't gonna sell. You can say that Nintendo has no choice but to cave in, but most likely, like all 3rd party publishers, they'll instead focus on the franchises that do sell. Nintendo still has shareholders to appease after all. Or we'll see a couple of these games that may or may not be good, along with a warning from Nintendo saying that it needs to sell xxx millions if they want a sequel. Or even worse, a mega casual surge of their games on mobile and a complete abandonment of their fanbase.

Not only that their fanbase will most likely abandon them too. I don't know if you know this, but there is a certain pride in the Nintendo fanbase. Most of their fans will treat it as though Nintendo abandoned them. The reward for decades of loyalty is Nintendo telling them that the systems they bought are worthless and to go buy a PlayStation? They won't go after those games on other systems. Its why Wii U has some of the strongest attach rates. I'm hovering around 50 Wii U games. You wanna know how many games from Nintendo I'd buy if I had to get it on PlayStation? Maybe one. Maybe.

Did the 12 million Dreamcast owners buy millions of units of all Sega games on other systems after Sega shut down? No. They all went onto something else and Sega floundered. I should know. I was a diehard Sega fan from Genesis, Saturn, and Dreamcast days.

actually you're wrong, there were Sega games that did VERY well on other systems. Sonic Rush is the 3rd best selling Sonic game. The 2nd best Virtua Fighter game came out on Playstaing, Crazy Taxi did just as well as on the other systems as DC. Sega's problem is and something that some Sega fans refuse to acknowledge is the quality of the games went down. You could see this all the way back to Saturn. Remember Bug? Exactly. They also made a lot of silly decisions along the way.

As for Ninty pride, i think some people just need to grow up? Betrayal? You're Wii U is not just gonna self destruct because Ninty went 3rd party that makes no sense. I would imagine that most of the people who have a ninty console already have at least one other machine (PC included) so is it really a big deal? Im gonna say no and chalk it up to a loud forum going minority who would fell betrayed.





Around the Network
Luke888 said:
Honestly I feel a bit frustrated about this theme going about Nintendo going third party. People don't make constantly topics about "What if Sony/MS whent third party" so I don't see why would you focus so much on Nintendo. yes, they have poor sales this generation, so ? Xbox was almost never profitable and Microsoft hinted various times that they might eventually exit the home console market since they own Windows while Sony due to their other divisions have lots of financial problems...

Its becasue it makes the most sense for nintendo unlike the others.  Xbox future is seen by many tied to windows as a service and what not.  So 3rd party is not in their future.  While any issues with sony are mute as PS would survive them, and we know that PS future is Now and streming them going 3rd party is the most remote of all possabilities.  They sale 3rd party games always have, them being one just make no sense never has.  

It just makes more sense for them then the others, that cant be really argued other wise given sales.  The user base nintendo could sale their product on is ten times bigger and growing then the one they achived with the wiiu.  There is a very legitamte business case to be made for why 3rd party is better for them then their current course of action.  



If they could develop for PC without somehow without diminishing the quality of their games, I would be all for it. I think the worry comes from a potential drop in quality if they have to start developing for multiple hardware configurations.



Locknuts said:
If they could develop for PC without somehow without diminishing the quality of their games, I would be all for it. I think the worry comes from a potential drop in quality if they have to start developing for multiple hardware configurations.

What would stop them from focusing on the highest user base option they are most comfortable with and later releasing on others to maintain quality while choosing the most logical finencial path.

Lets face it i they go 3rd party they are in the power seat, every platform holder will try to make a deal with them.  Sony and ms would be at war and Nintendo would be the beneficiary.  



oniyide said:
bunchanumbers said:


As for Ninty pride, i think some people just need to grow up? Betrayal? You're Wii U is not just gonna self destruct because Ninty went 3rd party that makes no sense. I would imagine that most of the people who have a ninty console already have at least one other machine (PC included) so is it really a big deal? Im gonna say no and chalk it up to a loud forum going minority who would fell betrayed.



 

You can't be serious. Did you see the reaction to Federation Force? The Nintendo Digital Event for E3? Or the overreaction to everything Smash or almost every other Nintendo IP? Or almost every thing Nintendo? They have a passionate dedicated fanbase. You can't tell me for a second that you think they'd all just smile and accept it.



Threalhusanrolla said:
Locknuts said:
If they could develop for PC without somehow without diminishing the quality of their games, I would be all for it. I think the worry comes from a potential drop in quality if they have to start developing for multiple hardware configurations.

What would stop them from focusing on the highest user base option they are most comfortable with and later releasing on others to maintain quality while choosing the most logical finencial path.

Lets face it i they go 3rd party they are in the power seat, every platform holder will try to make a deal with them.  Sony and ms would be at war and Nintendo would be the beneficiary.  

Well I wouldn't want them on Playstation or Xbox because then I would still need 2 machines :P