By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - What if Nintendo Doesn't Comeback?

 

Can Nintendo Dominate

It will Beat the Xbox One 161 32.66%
 
It will Beat X1 and PS4 59 11.97%
 
It will beat PS4 but not ... 53 10.75%
 
See Results 220 44.62%
 
Total:493
Pavolink said:
CosmicSex said:
Game_God said:
Was it or not (as I said) a Nintendo doom & gloom thread, as soon as it took of with all the usual Nintendo haters on board, OP left the building to damage control... it was cristal clear from the beginning sadly...

This is not a doom thread.  And OP was busy.  

He had no valid arguments to defend the current financial mess that was Wii U, so he went for the easy way: call this another doom thread and keep living in denial.



Which is really too bad because this thread is full of great comments and ideas. 



Around the Network
CosmicSex said:
naruball said:
mountaindewslave said:

 

Nintendo just needs to go back to their roots and make a more hardcore system without gimmicks and sales will pick up to an extrem amount

 

 

How did that work for them with Gamecube and N64?

If NX is some kind of fusion system, you can bet people will say that it only failed because it was a gimmick. Yet no one was calling the wiiu pad a gimmick when it was revelead. It became a gimmick when it stopped selling well.

All they need is reall third party support and a system with modern graphic capabilities.  From what I have heard, this wont be a problem.  



Ok, serious question. Who do you think will buy NX other than people who bought wiiu? Ps4 owners, xb1 owners or people who haven't bought any of the 3 consoles? The 3rd party support won't help all that much, because ps4 are happy playing 3rd pary games on their console, same with xb1 gamers. In other words, even if everything goes well, unless they come up with something that Sony and MS don't offer (last generation it was motion controls), they won't sell much more than 20m. Which could be enough for NInty to be profitable, but it still won't be able to compete with MS and Sony.





Pavolink said:
CosmicSex said:
Game_God said:
Was it or not (as I said) a Nintendo doom & gloom thread, as soon as it took of with all the usual Nintendo haters on board, OP left the building to damage control... it was cristal clear from the beginning sadly...

This is not a doom thread.  And OP was busy.  

He had no valid arguments to defend the current financial mess that was Wii U, so he went for the easy way: call this another doom thread and keep living in denial.

I wonder if you and me are among the "usual Nintendo haters" he describes. XD



mountaindewslave said:

Nintendo just needs to go back to their roots and make a more hardcore system without gimmicks and sales will pick up to an extrem amount

 

That's what Nintendo did with Wii U; had a more powerful console than the consoles in the market prior to it's release. Made a damn expensive dual analog controller that was better than the controllers on the market. Nintendo exactly what the "hardcore" wanted them to do. Wii U is a Gamecube 2, and largely for the same reasons Gamecube failed, so did Wii U.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

foxtail said:

Sony was unable to pay dividends in FY 2014 for the first time in 50 years and it wasn't game over for Kazuo Hirai.  

Besides, the majority of Nintendo shares are held by large banks who are not as fickle as the individual investors who are looking short term.  Nintendo has been a publicly listed company since 1962, and that's more than a decade before Microsoft existed.  Nintendo was also founded over a 126 years ago in 1889 as a card manufacturing company and has had to reinvent themselves many times over the years but has always found success in entertainment and games.  They also just recently moved into a new building and have merged their hardware and software divisions for better efficiency and productivity.  Nintendo knows there is a lot of strength in their IPs and creativity and and won't give up on those things anytime soon.  Nintendo wants profits too and hardware is still part of that equation.

New Nintendo Divisions Below:

  Establishment of the Entertainment Planning & Development Division
We will integrate personnel who are involved in the development of software for Nintendo platforms and smart devices in addition to work associated with effective utilization of character IP, and in order to create a structure that operates efficiently and rapidly, the Entertainment Analysis & Development Division and the Software Planning & Development Division will be consolidated into the newly established Entertainment Planning & Development Division.
  Establishment of the Platform Technology Development Division
We will integrate personnel responsible for the technology development essential for Nintendo’s hardware formation such as hardware, OS, development environment and network, and in order to create a structure in which we can more broadly and efficiently conduct technology development necessary for new products and services, the Integrated Research & Development Division and the System Development Division will be consolidated into the newly established Platform Technology Development Division.
  Establishment of the Business Development Division
We will newly establish the Business Development Division, a division with the aim of refining the business model for the dedicated video game system business, and creating and making profitable the smart device business and the new business that utilizes character IP.

I don't really know what this has to to with my post. Are you saying that investors would be willing to watch Nintendo to make losses for years?

When it's the banks and long-term investment in question, dividends have a much bigger role than short-term investment, where stock price ups and downs are everything. Short term it doesn't matter how much the company makes losses, as long as market expects a better future.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

Around the Network
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:

no one is pretending that it didnt beat PS360, but to pretend that a MAJOR factor in that victory wasnt the motion control is revisionist, especially how poorly the follow up console Wii u is doing. Wii went from Ninty's best selling home console to the it worse in one gen transition? Explain that one. 

I also find it funny that some people tout Wii beating the HD twins, but now when Wii U is getting a stomping all of a sudden Ninty doesnt compete with those two? ANd NX wont compete with PS4 and ONE?

I never said motion controls were not a major factor; of course they were, but that doesn't disqualify its victory. I've seen plenty of people right here on VGChartz use all kinds of inane logic to try to claim that the Wii lost last gen; from implying that casual purchases don't count to saying that attach rates or time on the market decide a generation's winner rather than actual consoles sold.

As for the collapse from Wii to Wii U, that's easily explained; Nintendo turned into fucking morons from 2011 onwards and actively refused to adapt to the changing marketplace. 

And while this may sound harsh, only diehard Nintendo loyalists claim they're not competing with PS/Xbox. They clearly are, and they're getting their arses kicked because they themselves refuse to acknowledge this.

Controls did play their part, but it is the games that made Wii a success, and lack of them that made Wii U fail. The market didn't change, it was Nintendo that did.





Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

bdbdbd said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:

no one is pretending that it didnt beat PS360, but to pretend that a MAJOR factor in that victory wasnt the motion control is revisionist, especially how poorly the follow up console Wii u is doing. Wii went from Ninty's best selling home console to the it worse in one gen transition? Explain that one. 

I also find it funny that some people tout Wii beating the HD twins, but now when Wii U is getting a stomping all of a sudden Ninty doesnt compete with those two? ANd NX wont compete with PS4 and ONE?

I never said motion controls were not a major factor; of course they were, but that doesn't disqualify its victory. I've seen plenty of people right here on VGChartz use all kinds of inane logic to try to claim that the Wii lost last gen; from implying that casual purchases don't count to saying that attach rates or time on the market decide a generation's winner rather than actual consoles sold.

As for the collapse from Wii to Wii U, that's easily explained; Nintendo turned into fucking morons from 2011 onwards and actively refused to adapt to the changing marketplace. 

And while this may sound harsh, only diehard Nintendo loyalists claim they're not competing with PS/Xbox. They clearly are, and they're getting their arses kicked because they themselves refuse to acknowledge this.

Controls did play their part, but it is the games that made Wii a success, and lack of them that made Wii U fail. The market didn't change, it was Nintendo that did.



 

what games did WIi U lack? The shovelware? Cause those are the only ones truly missing on that system. Damn near every popluar game on WIi (at least made by Ninty) had a follow up on Wii U but it still didnt help.



oniyide said:
bdbdbd said:

Controls did play their part, but it is the games that made Wii a success, and lack of them that made Wii U fail. The market didn't change, it was Nintendo that did.



 

what games did WIi U lack? The shovelware? Cause those are the only ones truly missing on that system. Damn near every popluar game on WIi (at least made by Ninty) had a follow up on Wii U but it still didnt help.

For starters, there was no no Wii U Sports, it only had recycled NSMB instead of a truly new game, the lack of Metroid Prime is pretty obvious. SM3DW is a game that 3D Mario fans obviously do not care about, nor do the 2D Mario fans. DKC:TF is pretty fucked up with tropical freeze (nobody want's a game about ice world, ice worlds suck). Competition is removed from Mario Party. Kirby who? The thing is, that even as some of the games had a sequel, they're just mediocre games. Where's Excite Truck, that'd be a fun game with online and improved tracks. Yoshi, a kids game, like it's these days.

I don't think it wasn't until 2015 that Wii U started to look appealing if you look it's games library. Wii U has a handful of first party games that are interesting, but outside of the said games, there's much about nothing that would spark an interest. I would gladly welcome all the shovelware if Wii U had more of the better games.





Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

bdbdbd said:
mountaindewslave said:

Nintendo just needs to go back to their roots and make a more hardcore system without gimmicks and sales will pick up to an extrem amount

 

That's what Nintendo did with Wii U; had a more powerful console than the consoles in the market prior to it's release. Made a damn expensive dual analog controller that was better than the controllers on the market. Nintendo exactly what the "hardcore" wanted them to do. Wii U is a Gamecube 2, and largely for the same reasons Gamecube failed, so did Wii U.

The Wii U is barely more powerful than PS360 at least not nearly powerful enough. Wii u should have been close to power of PS4 and x1 not close to PS360 systems that had already been out for like 8 years? Better than controllers on the market? according to who? cause most gamers still tout Xbox controllers as the best. And gamepad is limited to one console and you have to go through hoops to replace it? No ninty didnt do what the hardcore wanted at all. They tried to find some weird middle ground and it just didnt work





They're obligated to make a few more great new Metroid games on consoles before they go completely mobile infection.



Lube Me Up