That's because 'Global Warming' isn't the general term scientists use anymore, it's Climate Change. The term Global Warming seems more used by deniers, so using it yourself makes you sound like one.

I do find it funny though, Climate Change/Global Warming does exist, it's proven by evidence. However the thing in debate is 'Man made...' CC/GW. Are we responsible for contributing to the worlds change in climate or if the world adjusting to somethng else.

Eitherway, doesn't mean people should polute more.

I am not denying it. I just think that the world has a lot more problems RIGHT NOW which we should focus on instead of something that might be a problem in the future.

Now this is fun, living in a country like Italy where the government is one of the most corrupted in the world (if not THE MOST corrupted) this is how the current political scene looks like:
Right: the most corrupted portion of the government, also pretty racist;
Left: Less corrupted but still REALLY corrupted and they have terrible bills;
Plus there is a jumble of minor parties that don't necerssarily recognize themselves in either side or in the middle that say they want to change the coutry but in the end when they are given the opportunity they get corrupted.
Also most of this minor parties have some extremely stupid plans that would take the country on the edge of the abyss (like if it wasn't already), just to name a few:
Movimento 5 Stelle (Five Star Popular Movement): This "party" started as a joke from the comedian Beppe Grillo who then decided to make it something serious, he currently is at the top of the party as well as beeing a blogger. The problem with this party is that their main goal is to get Italy out of the UE that by any point of view is like declaring Bankrupcy. also beeing a popular movement they aren't cohesive meaning that they are easily corruptible;
Lega Nord(North League): This party is just a mess: they first started as a right party but soon became something else saying that they want to Split Italy among North and South since they believe that the South is the only region that is corrupted (which *hint*hint* isn't true), then they said that they want to leave the UE too, then they said that they want to stop accepting immigrants (which isn't exactly the easyest thing to do when Italy is one of the neares countries to Africa), the only good proposal they made was to eliminate Gypsy fields since Gypsy people are saddly one of the strongest collaborators of mafia groups since they aren't technically Italian citizens so they are "protected" if they go against the italian law.

Luckily I'm too young to vote and I hope the political scene will change but the situation has been the same for more than 40 years now (excluding the latest parites I talked about of course...)

I am a right-leaning centrist. Used to be more left-leaning, but i don't like where the left is going at this point

That depends a lot on where you live. I guess I'm just lucky to live in Norway.

I'm more or less straight down the centre.
I think the amount of state ownership matters less than your attitude to social issues nowadays though. Social issues I'm heavily libertarian. I think everyone should be able to do whatever they like, unless it interferes with other people doing the same. And more importantly we should actively fight to make sure people can do that.

(some people agree that in principle you should legally be free to do almost anything but then spend all their time trying to attack people who do things they don't like)

Anarcho-Capitalist.

You could say that's super right wing, in that it's the smallest possible Government. But super-right wing is fascism, which is also essentially the polar-opposite of Anarcho-Capitalism.

I got that. Just explaining why 'global warming' term is still used and why someone would be labeled 'ignorant conservative' if that term is used.

On topic, I'm centre left but vote based on policies. 

High five!

Marx has one of the most coherent and worked-out social and economic theories there is that clearly analizes the problems in a capitalist society and the way by which such a society economically operates. Given, Marx never formulated a clear awnser to this problem, that has been often left to other thinkers/statemen like Lenin (to name one of the more positive ones), sometimes with horrible effects. But these effects were never Marx' fault. If anything, Marx' theories saved a lot more people from horrible conditions that the number of people so-called communist regimes killed. Marx' theories are still very relevant and applicable.

On the other hand, the objectivist, libertarian views of someone like Ayn Rand just don't work, they inevitably lead to abuse, formation of huge monopolies, needless deaths due to heavy deregulation, egotism and so on. Ayn Rand also betrayed a system that allowed her to study and gain the knowledge needed to write filth like 'Atlas Shrugged' in the first place.