By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - How Sony Is Smart To Stack Early 2016 With Exclusives Against Microsoft’s Empty Early 2016-

Aura7541 said:
Jazz2K said:

Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. 

When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists.

To respond to your PC comment, there are consumers who prefer to play on consoles. If they prefer to play on consoles and want to play SFV, they will need to buy a PS4 because it is the only one where SFV will be available.

How exactly is this ok for PS but not for Xbox? 

 

"Wasn't Sony accused of having an empty line up this Holiday season as well? Because the PS4 had less exclusives than the X1."

That's exactly the same stupid rethoric you guys are trying to push.

People this gen... 



Around the Network
GribbleGrunger said:
Games like Firewatch and The Witness are never to be underestimated too. Sony have done a fantastic job of keeping that kettle boiling. Whether you like those games or not, they're always in the news and that's the battle won right there.

This ^.





paulrage2 said:

PlayStation exclusive retail title for 2016/2017:

1 - Nitroplus Blasterz: Heroines Infinite Duel (january, 5)
2 - Digimon Story Cyber Sleuth (february, 2. PS4/VITA)
3 - Gravity Rush Remastered (PS4 - february, 2)
4 - Megadimension Neptunia VII (PS4/VITA february, 2)
5 - Street Fighter 5 (february 16, PS4/PC)
6 - Samurai Warriors 4 Empires (march, 15. PS4/PS3/VITA)
7 - Senran Kagura Estival Versus (march, 15. PS4/VITA)
8 - Nights of Azure (PS4/PC march, 29)
9 - Ratchet & Clank (PS4 april, 12)
10 - Uncharted 4: A Thiefs Ends (PS4 april, 26)
11 - Horizon Zero Dawn (PS4 2016)
12 - The Last Guardian (PS4 2016)
13 - Persona 5 (PS3/PS4 2016)
14 - Kingdom Hearts HD 2.8 Final Chapter Prologue (PS4 - 2016)
15 - World of Final Fantasy (2016, PS4/PS3/VITA)
16 - Ni-Oh (PS4 2016)
17 - Dreams (PS4 2016)
18 - NieR: Automata ( PS4 2016)
19 - Star Ocean: Integrity and Faithlessness (PS3/PS4 2016 or 2017)
20 - The King of Fighters XIV (PS4 2016 or 2017)
21 - Gravity Rush 2 (PS4 - 2016 or 2017)
22 - Toukiden 2 (PS4/VITA - 2016 or 2017)
23 - Yakuza 0 (PS4 - 2016 or 2017)
24 - Ni No Kuni II: Revenant Kingdom (PS4 - 2016 or 2017)
25 - Detroit: Become Human ( PS4 2016 ou 2017)
26 - Gran Turismo Sport ( PS4 2016 or 2017)
27 - Tales of Berseria ( PS4 2016 or 2017, PS4/PS3)
28 - God Eater Resurrection (PS4/PSV/PC)
29 - God Eater 2 Rage Burst (PS4/PSV/PC)
30 - Gundam Extreme Vs-Force (PSV)
31 - JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Eyes of Heaven (PS4)
32 - Attack On Titan (2016 ou 2017 PS4/PS3/VITA)
33 - Sword Art Online: Hollow Realization (PS4/VITA)

Bangbang! Retweeted and highlighted some major release. 

:3

Oh and you forgot some other PlayStation exclusives such as:

Gran Turismo 6 (PS4 - 2017)

RIGS: mechanized combat league (PS4 - 2016)

WiLD PS4 - 2016.

Matterfall PS4 - 2016-17

PARAGON PC/PS4 - 2016.

Summer Lession PS4 - 2016.



oniyide said:
Jazz2K said:

Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. 

When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists.



 

why didnt you just stop at the first sentence, thats what this thread is about. Empty might be harsh but there seems to be like 3 confirmed games for the first half of Xone, i dont know what else anyone would call that. As for good, thats subjective maybe two people here said that? but so what? thats nothing to trip over IMHO

Poor? Weak? Sparse?

tiffac said:

Wasn't Sony accused of having an empty line up this Holiday season as well? Because the PS4 had less exclusives than the X1.

Yeah and it was awful...

Jazz2K said:
Aura7541 said:
Jazz2K said:

Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. 

When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists.

To respond to your PC comment, there are consumers who prefer to play on consoles. If they prefer to play on consoles and want to play SFV, they will need to buy a PS4 because it is the only one where SFV will be available.

How exactly is this ok for PS but not for Xbox? 

 

"Wasn't Sony accused of having an empty line up this Holiday season as well? Because the PS4 had less exclusives than the X1."

That's exactly the same stupid rethoric you guys are trying to push.

People this gen... 

Welcome to my world... often, I cite games for the XONE and then complain they are not exclusives since they are on Steam. Then they rub in everyone's face that SFV is an exclusive...



Its accidental, so I wouldn't exactly credit sony. Their titles simply aren't finished for 2015 (except maybe Ratchet?)

But since the holiday is usually filled with massive multiplatform titles it does make more sense to push exclusives into Q1-3. If sony wasn't already in the lead through its launch momentum and brand power in europe, they wouldn't be allowed to afford dud years like 2014/15. 



Around the Network

*snap*



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Jazz2K said:
Aura7541 said:
Jazz2K said:

Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. 

When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists.

To respond to your PC comment, there are consumers who prefer to play on consoles. If they prefer to play on consoles and want to play SFV, they will need to buy a PS4 because it is the only one where SFV will be available.

How exactly is this ok for PS but not for Xbox? 

 

"Wasn't Sony accused of having an empty line up this Holiday season as well? Because the PS4 had less exclusives than the X1."

That's exactly the same stupid rethoric you guys are trying to push.

People this gen... 

how many of Sony FIRST party titles are going to PC? Barely any. How many of MS? a few. Now in the grand scheme of things it dont really matter as yes, SF5 is technically not exclusive, but thats a 3rd party game which Sony doesnt really have that much say in the matter. One has to ask one self why is MS putting there own exclusive titles on PC? Isnt the point of exclusives to push your console? Why even bother making a console then? These are just questions that get brought up and it doesnt inspire confidence in some. Hope that explains it a bit.





GribbleGrunger said:
*snap*

gg why do you have a vacant look?

gg you're drooling everywhere!

gg why are you rocking back and forth?