By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide on 25 December 2015
Edit Thread
Jazz2K said:
Aura7541 said:
Jazz2K said:

Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. 

When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists.

To respond to your PC comment, there are consumers who prefer to play on consoles. If they prefer to play on consoles and want to play SFV, they will need to buy a PS4 because it is the only one where SFV will be available.

How exactly is this ok for PS but not for Xbox? 

 

"Wasn't Sony accused of having an empty line up this Holiday season as well? Because the PS4 had less exclusives than the X1."

That's exactly the same stupid rethoric you guys are trying to push.

People this gen... 

how many of Sony FIRST party titles are going to PC? Barely any. How many of MS? a few. Now in the grand scheme of things it dont really matter as yes, SF5 is technically not exclusive, but thats a 3rd party game which Sony doesnt really have that much say in the matter. One has to ask one self why is MS putting there own exclusive titles on PC? Isnt the point of exclusives to push your console? Why even bother making a console then? These are just questions that get brought up and it doesnt inspire confidence in some. Hope that explains it a bit.