By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Who should they acquire?

Capcom, Level 5 and Platinum games.
It would be nice if they could just acquire Atlus, but unfortunately Sega owns Atlus so I'm pretty sure out of all those choices, Atlus would be the lowest possibility.
I do see them buying Level 5 or Platinum though.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Around the Network
PAOerfulone said:

I don't really think the answer is to pull a 'Disney' and go nuts & purchase all these studios, rather than to expand upon the ones they already have.
Particularly EPD, Monolith Soft., and Retro.
Compared to.... say Naughty Dog, who currently has 300 employees and they put games out at a relatively good pace. Last of Us was 2013, and Uncharted 4 is next year. That's a 3 year gap between games, pretty reasonable.
Now look at Retro, which is around 100 employees, DKC Returns and Tropical Freeze had around a 3 year gap as well. Pretty reasonable, however there have been demands for years about them doing Metroid, or a new IP entirely. But if they were to grow around the same size as Naughty Dog, they'd be in a better position to put out 2, maybe 3 projects that can be DK, Metroid, and/or a new IP.
As for Monolith, seeing as how long it took them to make X after they finished development for the original Xenoblade Chronicles, it could be another 5 years before we get Xenoblade 3, or whatever new game they come out with on NX, which would be well into its life cycle at that point, and right now Monolith sits at 123 employees (as of last year, I'm going off Wikipedia). Having double the staff could lead to them putting out these giagantic, groundbreaking RPGs a lot faster, and could enable them to grow into Nintendo's BIGGEST asset outside of the Pokemon Company.
And EPD, which has merged EAD and SPD together, means that they've got far more developers working together one multiple projects, which should lead to faster development. A good first step, but I think that adding an "EPD Group 2" to go along with Group 1 could go a very long way into shortening development times and increasing effectiveness when it comes to releasing and making HD games.

That's really what I think they should do rather than try to buy out any 3rd party companies... Although I wouldn't be against them buying Intellectual Properties, like say... cough*Sonic*cough.

And to think:
If they were to expand many of their development studios to both decrease development time and increase software output, ALONG with the potential, most likely idea of NX being one hybrid console-handheld platform.
All of those expanded, bigger studios would only have to concentrate their all their efforts and resources on one platform, rather than divide and seperate them into 2 different ones, which had led to all the software droughts we've seen from the Big N this generation, ESPECIALLY on the console side.
Doing all that could wipe out the software drought problem almost entirely.

I agree with your post, Nintedo has some really good studios that produce high quality tittles.They should definetly expand those, specially Monolith Soft. 



Instead of buying studios they should make new ones or expand existing ones. I don't understand the mentality of "Nintendo should buy this" or "Sony should buy that"... it hurts the consumer more than anyone else when a 3rd party studio is bought by a 1st party company all it'd do is add more to the dick waving arguments over which console people prefer and why their choice is the 'best' one...



RingoGaSuki said:

Capcom, Sega, Platinum and Level-5. Especially now seeing as the former two are falling down anyways. Level-5 is a great developer and Nintendo needs to keep them exclusive. Next Level, Playtonic and some Western studios would be a wise investment too. Nintendo still has some of that Wii/DS cash, they should be bloody well using it.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but they already have a PS4 exclusive in development, possibly(and hopefully) Dark Cloud 3.



Sega! Just imagine an EAD developed Sonic game! Better yet, imagine a Monolith developed Skies of Arcadia! X_X



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network

If they get either capcom or square enix that would be good, because that would mean guaranteed games for nintendo systems. WIch i prefer



StarOcean said:
Instead of buying studios they should make new ones or expand existing ones. I don't understand the mentality of "Nintendo should buy this" or "Sony should buy that"... it hurts the consumer more than anyone else when a 3rd party studio is bought by a 1st party company all it'd do is add more to the dick waving arguments over which console people prefer and why their choice is the 'best' one...

It depends for me personally. When someone aquires one studio. There games will definetly come to that console who bought the studio. then you dont have to buy different consoles for different games. Lets say if Nintendo bought square enix or capcom. you could play all Nintendo Ip, and all square enix or capcom Ip on the same console without buying the other consoles.  In that regard i think its much easier for the wallet.



Buy Naughty Dog.



97alexk said:
StarOcean said:
Instead of buying studios they should make new ones or expand existing ones. I don't understand the mentality of "Nintendo should buy this" or "Sony should buy that"... it hurts the consumer more than anyone else when a 3rd party studio is bought by a 1st party company all it'd do is add more to the dick waving arguments over which console people prefer and why their choice is the 'best' one...

It depends for me personally. When someone aquires one studio. There games will definetly come to that console who bought the studio. then you dont have to buy different consoles for different games. Lets say if Nintendo bought square enix or capcom. you could play all Nintendo Ip, and all square enix or capcom Ip on the same console without buying the other consoles.  In that regard i think its much easier for the wallet.

I'm more or less with StarOcean, for me doing that works against my desire to buy said game if it's bought up by a 1st party, especially since my platform isn't owned by a single corp so mine can't buy other IP's which leaves me having my choices snatched away from me, especially when I have no desire to buy most systems this gen and the markets you neglect and push away isn't healthy at all tbh.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
97alexk said:
StarOcean said:
Instead of buying studios they should make new ones or expand existing ones. I don't understand the mentality of "Nintendo should buy this" or "Sony should buy that"... it hurts the consumer more than anyone else when a 3rd party studio is bought by a 1st party company all it'd do is add more to the dick waving arguments over which console people prefer and why their choice is the 'best' one...

It depends for me personally. When someone aquires one studio. There games will definetly come to that console who bought the studio. then you dont have to buy different consoles for different games. Lets say if Nintendo bought square enix or capcom. you could play all Nintendo Ip, and all square enix or capcom Ip on the same console without buying the other consoles.  In that regard i think its much easier for the wallet.

I'm more or less with StarOcean, for me doing that works against my desire to buy said game if it's bought up by a 1st party, especially since my platform isn't owned by a single corp so mine can't buy other IP's which leaves me having my choices snatched away from me, especially when I have no desire to buy most systems this gen and the markets you neglect and push away isn't healthy at all tbh.

No offense, but that didnt make any sense to me. Having a console with different games all on one consoles is much better for the wallet