| IIIIITHE1IIIII said: I'm gonna have to side with the company on this one. Considering your friend's answer, it would not be unreasonable for xyz to assume that their prospective employee is a flaming homosexual, as he shows no interest in increasing the number of female coworkers. Given how xyz would risk compromising the working environment for current, presumably heterosexual, employees as well as the company's image, I find that their decision to cut ties with your friend is sound. |
It doesn't matter which company it is, they can't just assume an employee or future employee is a homosexual who doesn't want female employees on the workforce and deny him of employment, because it's not only unethical, it is also illegal. The company is supposed to do what's best for business by looking for the employees that fits the profile regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, etc.











