By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - IGN..Zombi U/Zombi WTF

Aeolus451 on 22 August 2015
DerNebel said:

Edit: Eh, not worth it. There's a point when a post becomes so dumb that it doesn't even deserve attention.


I'm curious about it now after reading this. Some of the most entertaining things ever said starting like that. 



Around the Network
Mummelmann on 22 August 2015
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Maybe they were completely justified in it since it got more content later on? It doesn't matter how much content a game launches with; what matters is that gets more content added later.



Teeqoz on 22 August 2015

The Wii U version doesn't deserve 6.5.... The crappy PS4/XBO/PC port doesn't deserve 55...

Bad game + bad port =Total crap.



zippy on 22 August 2015
DerNebel said:

Edit: Eh, not worth it. There's a point when a post becomes so dumb that it doesn't even deserve attention.

Yet it got your attention because you had to post this :)



DerNebel on 22 August 2015
zippy said:
DerNebel said:

Edit: Eh, not worth it. There's a point when a post becomes so dumb that it doesn't even deserve attention.

Yet it got your attention because you had to post this :)

Yup, it got my attention, I made a post and then re-evaluated that it wasn't worth it. Sadly you can't delete posts on here, so I did his. ;)



Around the Network
zippy on 22 August 2015
DerNebel said:
zippy said:
DerNebel said:

Edit: Eh, not worth it. There's a point when a post becomes so dumb that it doesn't even deserve attention.

Yet it got your attention because you had to post this :)

Yup, it got my attention, I made a post and then re-evaluated that it wasn't worth it. Sadly you can't delete posts on here, so I did his. ;)


lol, that's actually a good idea, that I may borrow in the future :)



AZWification on 22 August 2015

I still wonder if anyone ever asked for this port. I don't expect its sales to be that good either!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

HoloDust on 22 August 2015
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Maybe they were completely justified in it since it got more content later on? It doesn't matter how much content a game launches with; what matters is that gets more content added later.

Hahaha...you mean, just like that other certain game? (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)

OT: Still playing Zombi, still thinking it's worth $20, still scoring it around 7.5. Never tried it on WiiU, but from what I've been playing so far, I think scanner on Gamepad would annoy me really quick given how much it annoys me even in this form.



Samus Aran on 22 August 2015
4k1x3r said:
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Because these are really, really, reaaaally good games? Just maybe.. u know.

I doubt many people would have these games in their top 5 PS4 games.



Samus Aran on 22 August 2015
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Maybe they were completely justified in it since it got more content later on? It doesn't matter how much content a game launches with; what matters is that gets more content added later.

Titanfall is practically dead online already. And no reviewer took that into account with Splatoon, so why should they take it into account with Titanfall?