I don't really discard the idea of a superior entity that created us, but I don't find any evidence that supports it yet.

If it exists, though, I've always considered it to be an evil entity, although I don't know if you can apply moral compass to such thing.

Thank you for that. As you and another user have mentioned one doesn't actually choose to become an atheist. I'll edit the OP accordingly.

On Topic: I'm reading all of your guys replies and I must say some have indeed been very thought inducing.

I won't tell you you're wrong, but from the way you speak about these matters it's obvious you're not a spiritual person. Belief in God concerns matters of the heart, not of the mind. That doesn't mean such belief isn't rational, but that the rationale comes from within, from deep introspective thought, not from the observation of the material world and cold reason.

Sorry for intruding into this thread, but before things inevitably turn ugly, I thought I'd have my say. Not sure what the point is in any thread if it's only a big circlejerk anyway.

Because I took the time to read about Abrahamic religions and realized they are wrong. Now I am too bored to continue searching for the right religion.

Please follow the OP's rules, thank you. I know you may disagree but it's always cool and awesome to know why other people are following their religion. 

There either is a god, or there is not.  It is a matter of truth.  It is not a matter of morality, opinion, phhilosophy, or preference (which would be dealt with with introspection).  It is true or it is not.  I don't see why this should be the one truth claim that does not need to be supported by evidence.  

I don't know if I'm an atheist. I don't really care what believe in or not. My main point for this is "Who's really God to judge me?" Only my mom and dad (maybe my sister too) can tell me if I'm a good or bad guy for my actions.

I don't care if religion is right or wrong either; if the Universe originated from an explosion or from a creator, my point of view in life wouldn't change. And I think that's the correct way of living.

I never chose to be an atheist. I am categorized as an atheist (or rather an agnostic atheist, as that's the only sensible thing to be) because I don't believe in things that can't be proven. You may say I believe in science, although that would be silly, as science isn't about believing, it's about the continuos pursuit for the truth. Sometimes scientists think they have found the truth, but most of the time they haven't. They may have found something which, based on what they know/ think they know, makes sense.

Honestly, there isn't anything to learn about about agnostic atheism, as it merely is to not believe. It's also kinda hard to choose to not believe. But if you find the concept of a continuos search for the truth more appealing than to presume you have already found it, I'd say you're an agnostic atheist.

Well that post turned into something else than I intended for it to be.

Are you an agnostic one?

Personally, I think it's useful to have opinions challenged rather than isulated.  It's your topic though I guess.