By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Uncharted 4 to be 60fps?

Frogger on 11 March 2015
Kerotan said:

The order is technically better than anything on the ps3, 360 or wii u. You must game on an ultra setting pc if the order standard ain't enough. 


The Order is running at 30fps with black bars obstructing the view 100% for of the game. It doesn't take ultra PC settings to see how much of a farce that is.



Around the Network
Dr.Vita on 11 March 2015

I guess not, they are not trying 60FPS. They want to bring us a very beatiful game.




Dr.Vita talks about Playstation Vita in 2016!
Playstation Vita Media Create Sales (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016)
Playstation Vita Japan Retail Software Sales (2013 vs 2014 vs 2015 + 2015 LTD Edition)
Prediction: Nothing will outsell PSP anymore (except Playstation home consoles)

Intrinsic on 11 March 2015
Kerotan said:


If you're going to compare at least use the proper quality images for the experience demo.  I have it in high quality on my laptop and the screens above look more like a ps3 game than the actual demo. 

Come on man u should know better by now. If people played fair they wouldn't be able to make comparisons like that. obviously they had to find the worst possible quality image to use or not what the point of such comparisons. 



Kerotan on 11 March 2015
spemanig said:
Kerotan said:

The order is technically better than anything on the ps3, 360 or wii u. You must game on an ultra setting pc if the order standard ain't enough. 


The Order is running at 30fps with black bars obstructing the view 100% for of the game. It doesn't take ultra PC settings to see how much of a farce that is.


I'm playing it right now and it ain't an issue. And 30fps is fine.  Do you complain about games on your preferred console that run at 30fps or are miles inferior to the likes of the order or driveclub.  Probably not. 



Kerotan on 11 March 2015
Intrinsic said:
Kerotan said:


If you're going to compare at least use the proper quality images for the experience demo.  I have it in high quality on my laptop and the screens above look more like a ps3 game than the actual demo. 

Come on man u should know better by now. If people played fair they wouldn't be able to make comparisons like that. obviously they had to find the worst possible quality image to use or not what the point of such comparisons. 


Yeah I know exactly what they're at and i enjoy pointing out the truth. I'd be embarrassed going around with dubbed down pictures of a game just to prove something that's not real. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story as they say!  



Around the Network
Frogger on 11 March 2015
Kerotan said:

I'm playing it right now and it ain't an issue. And 30fps is fine.  Do you complain about games on your preferred console that run at 30fps or are miles inferior to the likes of the order or driveclub.  Probably not. 

Lmao, do you even know my reputation here? What a joke.



Kerotan on 11 March 2015
spemanig said:
Kerotan said:

I'm playing it right now and it ain't an issue. And 30fps is fine.  Do you complain about games on your preferred console that run at 30fps or are miles inferior to the likes of the order or driveclub.  Probably not. 

Lmao, do you even know my reputation here? What a joke.


Lmao,  I said your preferred console for a reason.  I clearly don't know which one you game on but whichever one you do there are plenty of games miles inferior to the likes of the order from a technical and graphical point of view. 



Zekkyou on 11 March 2015
spemanig said:
kitler53 said:
no.

...and if it was delayed to hit 60 fps i'd be very pissed because i don't give a shit about 60 fps.


You'd be pissed if they delayed the game to make it objectively better. Everybody's gone to rapture, clearly.

To be honest i'd be pretty irritated too. As nice as 60fps can be, i really wouldn't be bothered by its absence in UC4. I'd rather have the game several months earlier, or them use the time to add additional content (or further improve the visuals). I suppose it's subjective though.

I'm still expecting a variable frame-rate option though.



Frogger on 11 March 2015
Kerotan said:

Lmao,  I said your preferred console for a reason.  I clearly don't know which one you game on but whichever one you do there are plenty of games miles inferior to the likes of the order from a technical and graphical point of view. 


I never said there weren't. I don't give a shit about "preferred consoles." If a game runs like shit for a reason that doesn't contribute directly to better gameplay, and I consider 30fps shit, I call it out. I called out the remake of my favorite game of all time for not running at 60fps. I couldn't give a flying rat's ass if it's on my "preferred console" or not.

Short of a game having a massively ambitious open world, there's no reason any 8th gen game should be running at sub-par framerates.



Zekkyou on 11 March 2015
spemanig said:
Kerotan said:

Lmao,  I said your preferred console for a reason.  I clearly don't know which one you game on but whichever one you do there are plenty of games miles inferior to the likes of the order from a technical and graphical point of view. 


I never said there weren't. I don't give a shit about "preferred consoles." If a game runs like shit for a reason that doesn't contribute directly to better gameplay, and I consider 30fps shit, I call it out. I called out the remake of my favorite game of all time for not running at 60fps. I couldn't give a flying rat's ass if it's on my "preferred console" or not.

Short of a game having a massively ambitious open world, there's no reason any 8th gen game should be running at sub-par framerates.

Unless the game's world is incredibly dynamic (of which there are none right now), that's not really a valid excuse for 30fps either. Reducing asset quality and LOD fields is all you'd need to do to hit 60fps. Any game that (currently) doesn't hit that mark is using the resources for better visuals.