What a useless contribution to this thread.

Wii, and so it should be.

Why? It's my opinion on this topic. I have both and I think they're both equally ugly.

The Wii is obviously the winner here. Just look at the Galaxy games, Epic Yarn, Skyward Sword and others!

Really? I always thought Ocarina of Time 3D looked more like an early Dreamcast game than a GameCube game or Wii game. There were definitely improvements over the original game, but I always felt it looked more like a half-remake. 

I think they're pretty close but I would say the Wii is probably the superior console when it comes to graphics. I mean, the New 3DS was needed just to get Xenoblade running properly on it.

I think the comparison between the xeno wii and 3ds is being looked at the wrong way. It's a port. A port the 3ds matches almost 100%. A port from completely different hardware. It was made for the wii, not the 3ds. And yet, the 3ds pushes it well. It's like a game being g ported from the 360 to ps3, it's not a representative look at what the ps3 could really do. Xeno is not what the 3ds can really do. It's still a port.

"Which do you prefer or consider better?"

So you think they are both as ugly although we have options to compare them? Why don't you compare them?

I somehow agree with you but you should mention that it's game exclusive to the new 3ds and won't run on the 3ds. This is not nit-picking but being correct in this context and makes a huge difference.

In the end we don't know how the port was or will be done, meaning we don't know how much effort is being put into the renedering tech for the port.

Wait, what? 3DS has a lot of new games, a lot more than Wii had.

Besides, this is a thread about graphics, not games.

3DS can't even touch GC.You honestly think a game like MP2 could run on the 3DS without any changes in the graphics?