Had way less levels than Mario 64

around 50 stars are only available by getting blue coins. the lack of stages means you need to play the same stage more and more. the level themes were more or less the same were as Mario 64 was very diverse. Fludd to me added very little to the game I would rather have long jump and other skills he could do without it.

Yoshi was nearly useless and died soon as he hit water meaning you had to keep getting him back over and over if you fail. eh idk i could go on and on

I was joking. I could have made that a bit clearer in my post. My bad. :D

Zelda 2 I hate that game.

The Nintendo seal of quality just meant that the game was official.

I can't think of a Nintendo developed (edit: or published) game I've played that is outright bad - but that's probably at least partly because I've avoided the sub-standard ones. Main Zelda games shouldn't even begin to get a mention - all 17 Zelda games are objectively good games.

Kirby. I don't like him or his silly little world.

There were many third party games that have the seal, and according to this site, sold terriblly. I have some of those games, and I'm pretty sure you can't generate profit from 70,000 sales.

"Beating" Cpt. Toad?

how about ENJOYING it?

The Nintendo Seal of Quality was used for games that were licensed by Nintendo, nothing more, nothing less.

I like Mario Sunshine more than Galaxy, so I dont know what is wrong with these jokers. I do know of a SMS glitch where if you use the official Nintendo 4x memory card(1019?) the game crashes when you grab certain blue coins. Problem fixed by removing the memory card and inserting after getting the item.

OT:I am going to say Super Princess Peach. Its not glitchy or anything, its just a terrible platformer and not up to snuff in any game design areas.