| ps4tw said: Looking at the sales figures, the Dreamcast, a console widely seen as a failure and the downfall of Sega, sold better than the Wii U to date. As Nintendo has the cash assest to survive a failed console, where will they go from here? It seems that they do not want to adapt to the demands of the modern gamer, and their core user base is smaller than ever. This being said, will this force Nintendo's hand out of the console business just as the Dreamcast did to Sega? How can Nintendo repair the publicity damage the Wii U has done to them in the eyes of gamers? |
I love how you claim that Nintendo's 'core base' is smaller than ever, when there handhelds are still selling extremely well (at least far better than any competitor handheld in the history of video gaming has come close to)
Nintendo's publicity has not been killed, nor the popularity of their franchises, nor the relevance of their name. The fact is that the Wii U was marketed terribly, it confused people and no one even realized that there was a new system to buy. obviously added a simple 'U' to Wii makes people think its more of an accessory than anything else
also arguably the Wii U was released at a bad time with a terrible game lineup. System launches and the success of said launches are based on the correct timing and strategies, the Wii U was just a poorly executed combination of those things.
you compare Nintendo to Sega when Sega at the time of the Dreamcast was not following up a success; they were following up a failure in the Sega Saturn. the Wii U follows a success. The Dreamcast was abandoned (well it was forced to be) in the middle of its life cycle do to Sega's financial struggles. Sega also did not have an extremely powerful and successful second part of their business (i.e. handhelds), nor did they have any real cash reserves to save themselves if the Dreamcast failed.
the comparison is extremely poor because besides a struggling system there is nothing in common with the 2 companies. It's amusing that you highlight the Dreamcast, that initically actually did not sell THAT poorly. it obviously later on collaspsed with the release of competitor systems but all the same. Nintendo did not sell THAT MANY units for the Gamecube and N64 but they made money. the Wii (and frankly any Gameboy iteration) proves that the NIntendo brand is virtually indestructable. as long as they are making money it is not extremely relevant if their systems have sale dominance because they will always be in a fairly comfortable position to try something new in the future
in the end the Nintendo brand is just too powerful for all of this naysayer business. They have consistently released acclaimed games and have the most powerful IP's in the entertainment industry outside of Disney. stop overreacting.











