By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - What game will have the best visuals of 2015? Zelda U or Uncharted 4? - Uncomparable? Something will still need visuals of the year!

 

Best visuals of 2015?

Uncharted 4 413 40.02%
 
Zelda U 448 43.41%
 
Other ( post below) 60 5.81%
 
see results 56 5.43%
 
Too early to tell, but I ... 55 5.33%
 
Total:1,032

Visuals?  Zelda.


Graphically?(tech wise) Uncharted.



Around the Network

Come on guys, how a game on WiiU can compete with Uncharted4 ?? Graphically I mean.

Let's talk about gameplay, fun factor when both are released.  Maybe we can talk about art design, which style we do prefer...



”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”

Harriet Tubman.

WiiU is not supposed to compete in graphics but...
I'm not really impressed by Uncharted 4.

If you look at it expecting 'next-gen' top notch graphics, then I've seen better PC games 2/3 years ago.

I'm more impressed with Zelda than a 4th sequel of uncharted that is not that much of an upgrade if you compare it with previous installments.



DonFerrari said:
padib said:
DonFerrari said:
Uncharted no contest. But quite funny that all Nintendo fans will imeadetely downplay it to "art style" being better on zelda because that is opinion and that can't be discussed.

But I seriously saw Indie games more pleaseing to look than Zelda. And the pics in this thread are quite deceiving. And UC had gameplay, details, life, richness, details far above anything possible last gen, so we can finally stop bitching about just having prettier graphics.

What is so funny about people having opinions?

You're on a forum, you're going to run into people who don't see things just like you do, unapologetically. So you might as well get used to it.

Also, I notice that you have some kind of issue with Nintendo fans, and keep bunching them in some kind of unanimous group. That's messed up.

It's fine to have opinion... but to use the right to have opinion to be obliviou to reality or to push "preferences" as truth is another thing.

Why do I put Nintendo fans all together??? I'm not doing it, I'm talking about the Nintendo fans that pretend any Nintendo game looks better than PS games because being cell-shaded is "more artistic" and keep saying the same thing to try and say the gap isn't big or nintendo games look better when they clearly don't. And the worst part about Nintendo locked on this condecending from Nintendo fans and gaming critics is that they get aways with investing nothing on technology and keep putting the same level of graphics (with small improvement) for 3 generations...

Pleople that I lumped together (and you are one of the biggest doing it, as you basically show your hate for Sony quite often) say they aren't impressed with UC4 because it is just UC3 with better res but jizz all on theirselves by a game that don't look much better than the GC version of it (and yes for cell-shaded GC Zelda was already gorgeous, but this isn't any more gorgeous in comparison for a 10 year gap).

And for your information I have no problem with Nintendo, my friend have all the newest games, I have all their consoles up to GC and will buy Wii+WiiU next year, have been playing Ninty for 20 years and liking the games and finding the graphics pleasing. But I can't put a straight face and say it looks better than PS4 games in graphical department because that is absurd. Journey and Flower looks on the same league of Zelda... But UC, please don't even try.


Words struggle to explain why Zelda is visually superior despite not having the same graphical intensity. So I'll explain it simply with this:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/95qc2yd22w8jsj9/Arting%20Correctly.png?dl=0



padib said:
Eddie_Raja said:

It's fine if you like a certain art style more, and you can make your own thread for that if you want to.  In the real world Uncharted 4 is FAR, FAR more impressive looking than Zelda U.

This is the thread for that...

And that's your opinion.

Graphical comparisons are technical and objective. Art style is subjective. You can't really have a differing opinion about something objective.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network

Zelda's graphics aren't impressive to me on a technical level. Uncharted definitely takes that.



Subjectively; it comes down to which style you enjoy the most. Objectively, as in terms of sheer graphical fidelity it has to be Uncharted 4 by a long shot.
However, "best visuals" is so much more, and for me this is a tie and I find both to be extremely appealing in the visual appartment, it is a nice bonus knowing that both will also likely also feature great music and gameplay.



Twilord said:
DonFerrari said:
padib said:

What is so funny about people having opinions?

You're on a forum, you're going to run into people who don't see things just like you do, unapologetically. So you might as well get used to it.

Also, I notice that you have some kind of issue with Nintendo fans, and keep bunching them in some kind of unanimous group. That's messed up.

It's fine to have opinion... but to use the right to have opinion to be obliviou to reality or to push "preferences" as truth is another thing.

Why do I put Nintendo fans all together??? I'm not doing it, I'm talking about the Nintendo fans that pretend any Nintendo game looks better than PS games because being cell-shaded is "more artistic" and keep saying the same thing to try and say the gap isn't big or nintendo games look better when they clearly don't. And the worst part about Nintendo locked on this condecending from Nintendo fans and gaming critics is that they get aways with investing nothing on technology and keep putting the same level of graphics (with small improvement) for 3 generations...

Pleople that I lumped together (and you are one of the biggest doing it, as you basically show your hate for Sony quite often) say they aren't impressed with UC4 because it is just UC3 with better res but jizz all on theirselves by a game that don't look much better than the GC version of it (and yes for cell-shaded GC Zelda was already gorgeous, but this isn't any more gorgeous in comparison for a 10 year gap).

And for your information I have no problem with Nintendo, my friend have all the newest games, I have all their consoles up to GC and will buy Wii+WiiU next year, have been playing Ninty for 20 years and liking the games and finding the graphics pleasing. But I can't put a straight face and say it looks better than PS4 games in graphical department because that is absurd. Journey and Flower looks on the same league of Zelda... But UC, please don't even try.


Words struggle to explain why Zelda is visually superior despite not having the same graphical intensity. So I'll explain it simply with this:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/95qc2yd22w8jsj9/Arting%20Correctly.png?dl=0

I kinda see a trend there... do you agree with the winner or see the same trend?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Zelda U is going to kick more ass, but Uncharted may look nicer



XBOX ONE/Wii U/3DS/PC

RIP Iwata 12/6/1959-7/11/2015

Thanks for all the great memories!

Uncharted will look better but I think Zelda will age better with its style over realism.



http://moongypsy.bandcamp.com/ ~Thank you Stefl1504 for the amazing sig~