By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Twilord said:
DonFerrari said:
padib said:

What is so funny about people having opinions?

You're on a forum, you're going to run into people who don't see things just like you do, unapologetically. So you might as well get used to it.

Also, I notice that you have some kind of issue with Nintendo fans, and keep bunching them in some kind of unanimous group. That's messed up.

It's fine to have opinion... but to use the right to have opinion to be obliviou to reality or to push "preferences" as truth is another thing.

Why do I put Nintendo fans all together??? I'm not doing it, I'm talking about the Nintendo fans that pretend any Nintendo game looks better than PS games because being cell-shaded is "more artistic" and keep saying the same thing to try and say the gap isn't big or nintendo games look better when they clearly don't. And the worst part about Nintendo locked on this condecending from Nintendo fans and gaming critics is that they get aways with investing nothing on technology and keep putting the same level of graphics (with small improvement) for 3 generations...

Pleople that I lumped together (and you are one of the biggest doing it, as you basically show your hate for Sony quite often) say they aren't impressed with UC4 because it is just UC3 with better res but jizz all on theirselves by a game that don't look much better than the GC version of it (and yes for cell-shaded GC Zelda was already gorgeous, but this isn't any more gorgeous in comparison for a 10 year gap).

And for your information I have no problem with Nintendo, my friend have all the newest games, I have all their consoles up to GC and will buy Wii+WiiU next year, have been playing Ninty for 20 years and liking the games and finding the graphics pleasing. But I can't put a straight face and say it looks better than PS4 games in graphical department because that is absurd. Journey and Flower looks on the same league of Zelda... But UC, please don't even try.


Words struggle to explain why Zelda is visually superior despite not having the same graphical intensity. So I'll explain it simply with this:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/95qc2yd22w8jsj9/Arting%20Correctly.png?dl=0

I kinda see a trend there... do you agree with the winner or see the same trend?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."