| Euphoria14 said: Suddenly Nintendo fans forget the Pokemon review and now love IGN. Ah, how lovely things work. |
Wat lol. IGN had the "Too Much Water" in cons which is arguably laughable XD

| Euphoria14 said: Suddenly Nintendo fans forget the Pokemon review and now love IGN. Ah, how lovely things work. |
Wat lol. IGN had the "Too Much Water" in cons which is arguably laughable XD

HATE that there's no adventure mode. Still is a fun game with a ton of content. It's just that all the content revolves around the main smash mode. Not much more than that adventure/platforming wise. I mean, what happened to board the platforms and specific character target tests? 9.8 is a great score though! I bet if all the water stages were gone it would have got a 10.
| Euphoria14 said: Suddenly Nintendo fans forget the Pokemon review and now love IGN. Ah, how lovely things work. |
They didn't forget. Look at all the water comments.
Guess there's no water! That's great! I love not having water in my games
XBOX ONE/Wii U/3DS/PC
RIP Iwata 12/6/1959-7/11/2015
Thanks for all the great memories!

| cycycychris said:
OT: I think he took .2 off since he wasn't to crazy about the board game thing. |
That's dumb. If the game didn't have it at all, it probably would've been a 10.
It got minus .2 because of an extra feature 
sundin13 said:
Most people have been playing fairly lag free. What is your internet like? Also, try getting the Wii LAN Converter if you don't already have one because wired>wireless
|
I dont care if people are trying to make jokes. Point is that people aren't suddenly contesting the score, but rather embracing it, so your point is moot. I read it as "If pokemon had less water, it would have gotten higher than 7.8. If Smash had tons of water it would have scored less than 9.8." They are jokes, nothing more, and terrible ones at that.
This is the same outlet that was claimed to have a bias last gen, yet named Galaxy as game of the generation. And when that happened, guess what, it wasn't contested.
When the score isn't what they like, they bitch and moan.
When the score is what they like, they don't contest it like they do the scores they don't like.
I've been around long enough. I've seen how it works.
Great score either way and deserved. Played it myself, but if it's a spade, i'll call it a spade.
iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.
Currently playing:
Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)

![]()
| ktay95 said: Eh coming from Otero. He probably gave it a +2 just for being Nintendo, Im sure its real score was 7.8 |
Yeah, because of "too much water."
Can't these idiots take their eyes off the water for even a single moment?

I WON A BET AGAINST AZUREN! WOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
:3
*Sound Of Rain said:
That's dumb. If the game didn't have it at all, it probably would've been a 10. It got minus .2 because of an extra feature |
Actually, I think the .2 was because of the menu's and other small tiffs. Jose was still wondering if he should dock it for an extra feature. He evidently decided against it. If he did dock it, he would have put it as a minus.
