By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Watch Dogs U hours away; no reviews. Bad sign?

Roma on 17 November 2014

I pity those who will have to review it :P



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

Around the Network
Dulfite on 17 November 2014
Burning Typhoon said:
toot1231 said:
Dulfite said:
toot1231 said:
vextrex said:
Watch dog on wii u will be the biggest flop of ubisoft... Releasing this game months after other console was completely stupid....nobody wants to play this game anymore


I have no idea what the fuck they were thinking it killed any potential sales it could of had.


If you believe the conspiracy that I do (that 3rd party companies are intentionally destroying their game sales on Nintendo devices by doing really stupid things in order to weaken Nintendo to the brink of destruction so that they can be happy and spoiled by Microsoft and Sony who will do whatever the 3rd parties want), then this makes perfect sense.


I agree; im with you something shady is no doubt going on.


Or... they could just ignore Nintendo and not pay for the development of the game to begin with.

Except that wouldn't give gamers a sour taste. Think about it. If kids grow up playing on Nintendo devices and they play versions of games that stink compared to their counterparts, then they will eventually ditch NIntendo and go to the other companies, therefore leaving Nintendo in the dust. My theory is these 3rd parties want to destroy Nintendo's BASE core gamers, and the only way to do that is to convince them that Nintendo devices are limited and horrible.



Metallox on 17 November 2014
curl-6 said:
I'm waiting for Digital Foundry, I want to know if the framerate is playable; the PS3 version suffered pretty badly in that department.


I doubt they are going to waste their time checking the game; the other versions released on May. 



My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first. 

curl-6 on 17 November 2014
Metallox said:
curl-6 said:
I'm waiting for Digital Foundry, I want to know if the framerate is playable; the PS3 version suffered pretty badly in that department.


I doubt they are going to waste their time checking the game; the other versions released on May. 

They did Need for Speed on Wii U, which released like 6 months after the PS3/360 versions.



Fusioncode on 17 November 2014
TheGoldenBoy said:
I forgot the game was releasing on Wii U.

So did Ubisoft. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Around the Network
Metallox on 17 November 2014
curl-6 said:
Metallox said:
curl-6 said:
I'm waiting for Digital Foundry, I want to know if the framerate is playable; the PS3 version suffered pretty badly in that department.


I doubt they are going to waste their time checking the game; the other versions released on May. 

They did Need for Speed on Wii U, which released like 6 months after the PS3/360 versions.

Time to blame Ubisoft then.



My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first. 

Burning Typhoon on 17 November 2014
Dulfite said:
Burning Typhoon said:
toot1231 said:
Dulfite said:
toot1231 said:
vextrex said:
Watch dog on wii u will be the biggest flop of ubisoft... Releasing this game months after other console was completely stupid....nobody wants to play this game anymore


I have no idea what the fuck they were thinking it killed any potential sales it could of had.


If you believe the conspiracy that I do (that 3rd party companies are intentionally destroying their game sales on Nintendo devices by doing really stupid things in order to weaken Nintendo to the brink of destruction so that they can be happy and spoiled by Microsoft and Sony who will do whatever the 3rd parties want), then this makes perfect sense.


I agree; im with you something shady is no doubt going on.


Or... they could just ignore Nintendo and not pay for the development of the game to begin with.

Except that wouldn't give gamers a sour taste. Think about it. If kids grow up playing on Nintendo devices and they play versions of games that stink compared to their counterparts, then they will eventually ditch NIntendo and go to the other companies, therefore leaving Nintendo in the dust. My theory is these 3rd parties want to destroy Nintendo's BASE core gamers, and the only way to do that is to convince them that Nintendo devices are limited and horrible.

That didn't do a thing to me when playing on Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, PS1, PS2, or those crap multi-plat ports on PS3.  You know what would have hurt more?  Not being able to experience the game at all.  Inferiority isn't going to be noticed much by "kids."  Not having the game at all means you immediately notice, since the only way to play is to get the other console.

Games being the slightest bit inferior is something older people look at.  If a game is missing, you wont get the console.  If a game is on the console, and you want it, you get that console.

I thought the sega genesis was the more powerful console when i was little.  You know why?  My brother said so.



Bman54 on 17 November 2014

I feel like only Nintendo exclusives reviewers are going to review it. There isn't much of a point in re-reviewing it.



Mr Khan on 17 November 2014

Nobody gives a shit, is all. I doubt the game could be any worse than other Wii U ports. A handful of advantages, a few disadvantages due to poor optimization.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Smear-Gel on 17 November 2014

Apparently DLC is being released on eshop?