By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Can anyone say to me why nintendo shos us a grpahic and than they use another in ZELDA U??

Teeqoz on 04 November 2014

I like the cel-shaded one better...



Around the Network
Deeds on 04 November 2014
Lucas-Rio said:
curl-6 said:
Skidmore said:
curl-6 said:

I wasn't talking about personal preference, I was talking about commercial appeal in the current market. 

We are the current market, the loyalists

Unfortunately, the loyalists are not enough. If Nintendo only sells to the loyalists, they'll be extinct within a decade. They need to expand their player base.


Seriously, fuck the market.

That new Zelda looks incredibly better than that demo tech and the world will be fantastic, beyond what would be possible with a more photorealistic approach.

Lol. Just ignore them. The "market" wants more "mochoor" games yet they are the same one who would cry tears of joy if they got a new Bear in shorts game or grinning Bandicoot in sneakers game.



Norris2k on 04 November 2014
Podings said:


One is a tech demo to show off the power of hardware, the other is an actual game.

Anyone getting hyped for a game looking like the tech demo does so at their own expense.

Actively spreading the notion that Nintendo are "hyping" one game but "changing" it to look like something else is simply bad form though, as they are doing nothing of the sort.

Not to tell that someone is right to base his expectations on a tech demo, but what is wrong with Nintendo to show that "we now have the power to deliver an high quality and realistic graphics in HD for Zelda" and deliver a totally different, cartoonish zelda... again ?



TK14 on 04 November 2014

I LOVE how Zelda U looks. Save the tech demo look for a Twilight Princess HD remake. It's just nice to see an open-world action/adventure game with a vivid, brighter color palette for a change. Not every game needs to look like Skyrim or Assassin's Creed.



Upcoming Games To Get

Definite: Kirby Star Allies (Switch), Mario Tennis Aces (Switch), Fire Emblem (Switch), Yoshi (Switch), Pokemon (Switch), Kingdom Hearts 3 (PS4), Monster Hunter World (PS4)

Considering: Fe (Switch), Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze (Switch), The World Ends With You (Switch), Ys VIII (Switch), Street Fighter V: Arcade Edition (PS4), Kingdom Hearts 2.8 Remix (PS4), The Last Guardian (PS4), Shadow of the Colossus HD (PS4), Anthem (PS4), Shenmue 3 (PS4), WiLD (PS4)

Frogger on 04 November 2014
prayformojo said:
I have no idea why they do it. You'd think they'd have learned their lesson with WW.


They did. Windwaker is the best Zelda of all time. The remake proved that people still love it. He did it again. The reception has been overwhelmingly positive. 



Around the Network
Lucas-Rio on 04 November 2014
Deeds said:
Lucas-Rio said:
curl-6 said:
Skidmore said:
curl-6 said:

I wasn't talking about personal preference, I was talking about commercial appeal in the current market. 

We are the current market, the loyalists

Unfortunately, the loyalists are not enough. If Nintendo only sells to the loyalists, they'll be extinct within a decade. They need to expand their player base.


Seriously, fuck the market.

That new Zelda looks incredibly better than that demo tech and the world will be fantastic, beyond what would be possible with a more photorealistic approach.

Lol. Just ignore them. The "market" wants more "mochoor" games yet they are the same one who would cry tears of joy if they got a new Bear in shorts game or grinning Bandicoot in sneakers game.


I know, I know, but how someone couls be disappointed looking at that Zelda graphics is so strange.... The graphic style is absolutely gorgeous.



AZWification on 04 November 2014

I'm pretty sure that the E3 2011 Zelda U was uspposed to be just a tech demo.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Lucas-Rio on 04 November 2014
Norris2k said:
Podings said:


One is a tech demo to show off the power of hardware, the other is an actual game.

Anyone getting hyped for a game looking like the tech demo does so at their own expense.

Actively spreading the notion that Nintendo are "hyping" one game but "changing" it to look like something else is simply bad form though, as they are doing nothing of the sort.

Not to tell that someone is right to base his expectations on a tech demo, but what is wrong with Nintendo to show that "we now have the power to deliver an high quality and realistic graphics in HD for Zelda" and deliver a totally different, cartoonish zelda... again ?

 

Twilight Princess is the best seller of the Zelda Franchise. Mainly because it was also released when the Wii was at his peak.

But it is also a much inferior game compared to Skyward Sword, in almost every way. I'd rather have an inspired game with a unique world rather than an OOT clone.



cutzman25 on 04 November 2014

the reason why I am not buying their console. i was hoping for that true next-gen Zelda



PSN & XBOX GT : cutzman25

Podings on 04 November 2014
Norris2k said:
Podings said:


One is a tech demo to show off the power of hardware, the other is an actual game.

Anyone getting hyped for a game looking like the tech demo does so at their own expense.

Actively spreading the notion that Nintendo are "hyping" one game but "changing" it to look like something else is simply bad form though, as they are doing nothing of the sort.

Not to tell that someone is right to base his expectations on a tech demo, but what is wrong with Nintendo to show that "we now have the power to deliver an high quality and realistic graphics in HD for Zelda" and deliver a totally different, cartoonish zelda... again ?


I'm not sure I understand the question. The stylized Zelda they showed at E3 looks both technically more impressive and visually more original and interesting than the tech demo.