By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Call of Duty AW runs at native 1080p on PS4 (900p on XBO)

CGI-Quality said:

Most games have had differences, be it res or otherwise. I'd say the PS3 and 360 were: "marginal" in contrast. The newer machines are farther apart. Though this does help your point, it still doesn't explain what: "most people think". There's a reason, you can't measure that.

Factually, the PS4 performs, in most cases, about as far apart as the systems are in power (anywhere from 30-40%). People just like to dismiss a res difference of 720-920p vs 1080p as "marginal". It is not, and that still doesn't account for other differences, like framerate, VSYNC, textures, and aliasing (all areas where the PS4 usually is ahead, as well).

Shut up CGI, you don't know anything. The difference between 900p and 1080p is absolutely tiny, and anyone who says otherwise is lying. That's why PC gamers usually turn down stuff like textures and AA rather than resolu-- Oh... Never mind, carry on *whistles*



Around the Network

I thought they said it was 1080p on X1? Oh well, maybe the next COD will be 1080p.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

Xbox fans didn't care about resolution last gen. They never once compared resolution between ps3 and 360 games. They never once ever even brought up the subject. Not sure why they would start caring now??



Sharpryno said:
bevochan said:
cutzman25 said:
I will stick to the 900p version because of xbox live. PSN is down too much for me to buy a strictly MP game for it


I'll wait until someone (digital foundry) does a frame rate test.  What if the xbox1 version has lots of drops in FPS?

It won't.

 

Good enough for me, I don't get CoD for graphics.  If I did I would get it on PC where I can max it with my gtx 770 ez.

Just vastly better on XBL. 


Frame rates are more important than graphics though. He has a point. 



The small difference in resolution shouldn't even come up as a subject in the first place. This game should be running the same specs as PS4, there's no reason not to.
Especially seeing as Xbox customers buy these 1st person shooters just as much as any other system, give them their damned specs. Like Microsoft should be making sure this game is at least par.....ah fuck it whatever!!!



                                  Gaming Away Life Since 1985


Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
Damian.W said:
CGI-Quality said:
Damian.W said:
CGI-Quality said:

-snip

snippy-

begon

There's no exaggeration here. In raw numbers, the difference is bigger this time. And we haven't even seen the best games, yet. Pointless to mention the PS3's best.

I really don't know why you're repeating the same things over and over again. I've already agreed that in raw numbers, the ps4 is more powerful, and will always get the superior visuals. Why you keep repeating that rather than respond to my arguments is honestly both confusing and disheartening. 



I <3 Classic Platformers!

Multi-console Owner FTW

glimmer_of_hope said:
The small difference in resolution shouldn't even come up as a subject in the first place. This game should be running the same specs as PS4, there's no reason not to.
Especially seeing as Xbox customers buy these 1st person shooters just as much as any other system, give them their damned specs. Like Microsoft should be making sure this game is at least par.....ah fuck it whatever!!!

XB1 could do 1080p at the expense of the framerate which would ruin the game moreso than 900p, so not gonna happen.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

COLD_COBRA_ said:
Xbox fans didn't care about resolution last gen. They never once compared resolution between ps3 and 360 games. They never once ever even brought up the subject. Not sure why they would start caring now??


That is because they was busy with counting foliage.. tiny small grass on the ground..  also Contrast level.. and they haven't figured out yet that you can change that on your tv.. and PS fans haven't figured out yet that the Ps3 can change betweem Full and limited RGB on their settings to crisp the colors up.

 

Why is people trying to justify 900p and 60fps as if it's better then 1080p and 60fps.  * I can't see those extra 600 000 pixles.. it's the fps that matters...,,,,* DUUH.. those 60fps is on the 1080p version as well..  People needs a braincheck for a tumor



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

Then when you put both side by side theyll look identical.



Mad55 said:
Then when you put both side by side theyll look identical.

Hardly... one is blurry the other not.