if they would have released it it would have flopped and then people would complain that they got an inferior version. It is what it is, no deception here deal with it.

But they should explain Rouge

doesnt matter why because one thing is for sure they are lying straight to our faces..

They could have spared us the BS and simply said that since AC III sold 270k and AC: Black Flag sold even less (200k) they decided to simply skip it.

Given Ubi's quest for parity between the xb1 and ps4, I'd hate to see what the game would look like if a Wii u version was released, 'we don't want people to be arguing over resolution, so we've made all versions 320p so they are the same across all platforms'.

Sheesh, they should just cut straight to the point and say that:
1. Their games sell like crap on Wii U.
2. It's more expensive to port to Wii U.

Total Profit = (Quantity*Revenue) - (Technology Cost + Capital)

Probably was not economically viable to port the game over to the Wii U considering the lukewarm(at best) sales of previous AC games to the playform...

It's understandable the Unity isn't on WiiU, but Rogue ?

You've done that before, why's it a problem now?
Just say the truth already and move on.

I really couldn't care less.. If I will ever want to play AC: Unity, then I will play it when I get a X1.

How long are we going to have this discussion on Ubisoft?