Oh yeah, it's definitely because of 60fps that makes the PC version more responsive.

Motion blur is a good way to "disguise" 30fps, so to speak, but usually it comes at the cost of control responsiveness and makes the images look artificial. I think what makes Driveclub an exception is that it looks really realistic (especially in lighting, which is very important for implementing good motion blur) and Evolution managed to find a way to reduce latency. What I'm worried about with the console versions of Shadow of Mordor is that the controls are already less responsive at 30fps and may be further negatively affected by motion blur due to latency (unless, the devs managed to reduce the latency, too).

Thanks!

But like you said it's also possible that some earlier versions of the game were uncapped even if some people still watched the capped game (like the gamersyde video) and still thought it was uncapped. Anyway It's the same game, but just capped. the game could run at ~35-60fps like Infamous or better like like Tomb Raider, we'll never know.

Launch day open world multiplat: AC4 game 900p on XB1, 1080p on PS4 with better AA (for reminder we had the glorious customized SMAA 2TX on PS4)

11 months later open world multiplat: Mordor 900p on XB1, 1080p on PS4 with better shadows & vegetations (and sometimes I noticed better textures even if DF refused to admit it).

The PS4 ~40% advantage is rouglhy the same even after 10% boost, and june SDK... 

People will say, but some games have same resolutions, yes but at launch too with for instance Fifa 14 which was perfectly identical a launch too between both consoles. Some developers aim for parity (mostly EA), but even then, they have trouble reaching it now for Fifa 15 (Suprisingly no motion blur on XB1 version) and Destiny and Minecraft, both games run with constant frame pacing issues on XB1, resulting in regular judder which should be for everyone the worst thing that could happen to those versions. 

Aren't you surprised DF never done a face-off for Minecraft? I mean, it's just the most sold game of the decenny! Now you know why.

And when DF wrote a full negative preview article almost only about the frame pacing issue of the Destiny Beta PS4 version (which have being fixed after), now this constant frame pacing issue is fully in effect in the retail XB1 version, but now "it's not a big deal" and they barely talk about only focusing about the visuals, competely ignoring the framerate constant judder.

Constant frame pacing issue is now "not a big deal" for DF? since when? I thought it was their worst ennemy in previous articles like the Destiny PS4 beta, NFS and others.

What people forget is that XB1's SDK improve as much as PS4's SDK. The difference is that Microsoft talk about their improvements much more that Sony which are almost completely silent about it. But we have indirect clues from developers that Sony are regularly improving their own SDK and drivers both for the CPU and GPU.

EDIT: About the AA, I don't think they are using FXAA, and DF never wrote as far as I know "FXAA", they just wrote "post AA". And I don't think it's pure "vaseline" either because it's somehow improving the edges notably of the sword compared to the PC version and some edges are barely touched. It could be a modern version of Quincunx, only the AMD version. Some kind of supersampled but blurry post AA, but still better somhow that FXAA, which has tons of awful artefacts not seen here. Here It's blurry, yes, but it's very clean surprinsingly notably the main characters.

Guys.

The quote trees.

By God. Kill them off.

I warned 'em!  Those quote trees were forged by the hands of lucifer himself!

Triangulation is what you do to find out where something is located (using a GPS or sextant or whatever). Triangle, in this case, is a base polygon building block and it's what Cerny was talking about.

Just a pet peeve when someone is using a completely wrong term.

Of course not.  You see, going from 720p to 900p is a MASSIVE 180 extra lines of resolution.  While going from 900p to 1080p is a mere 180 extra lines of resolution.  So, see, big difference.

Well I can't argue with math. 180p>180p.

Unh. I'm currently playing forza horizon 2 and getting sunset overdrive. I like halo a lot so that game is next then ill catch up on same 3rd party games. No biggie.

The GPU isn't the only thing in a computer that matters.  The CPU, the Ram, the bus speed, the HDD's etc... all important facets of a build.  The APU itself, is an interesting bit of tech.  Yes, the Kabini is aimed at notebooks and mini PC's, Temash at Tablets, and the Kyoto at Micro-servers.  But the PS4's APU is highly modified.  It has 8 ACE's, which is only available in AMD's R290+ cards.  The XB1's Jaguar is modified also, but where the PS4 put in extra ACE's and other such modules, Microsoft put in the ESRAM which takes up a shitload of die space.

Now, here's where your argument breaks down.  The HD6870 launched Oct. 22nd 2010.  You realize that's nearly 4 years worth of optimization, right?  I know allot of people forget this, but PC GPU's don't just stand still with their drivers either.  They're constantly updated.  So, wouldn't it only be fair to wait 4 years, after the PS4's API has had 4 years of refinement to be making claims about your PC matching it?

Keep in mind, I only have the slightly faster 560Ti in my machine, so I'm not hating on PC here.  But, you can't expect a modified APU that's been out for less than a year to have the same kind of API refinement as a GPU that's been out for 4 years.

Don't care... sure... even so I believe some of most doesn't care due agenda.

Can't tell... lol it is obvious not true.