Depends on the Mario :3

OK, OK! I guess some exceptions do exist!

The article is a crock of useless boiling horse shit.

I think Sean Malstrom said it best. (and I quote below) These is just a fraction of his piece but it makes too much sense not to ignore.

"It’s nice when people realize it is ridiculous to worry about fantasy women who only exist in our imaginations. If women can’t look hot in fantasy, then where can they look hot? Are we to believe that a woman can cast fireballs, raise the dead, transport people across the world, yet it is ‘unrealistic’ for her to not be fat? I’d imagine if women had magic powers, the first thing they would do is make themselves look super hot"

In other words, we're taking realism way too seriously in the land of fiction (particularly in video games and comics). That's all it is, is fiction. It was never mean to represent or portrayal what the human gender is supposed to look like.  it's just a guy's (or even gal's) fantasy.

Plus don't bring up the issue of kids being influenced by these (fictional) characters because that just further proves the point above in that fictional characters are/were never meant to be taken seriously in the first place. They're just based off of a person's imagination of what the human (whether male or female) being could look like outside of reality.

Plus I don't see or hear any outrage from men when women picture guys to look like Zangeif, or Jacob Black.

Here is the full article by the way...

http://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/the-market-is-the-moral-regulator-of-video-games/

Well this article is a load of crap.

Really, it's only after Other M did this whole "sexualisation" of Samus began.

Fucking THIS!