Strong argument...

Im just saying that I have faith in the talent at Nintendo. I also think Bethesda could make an amazing platformer.

So Bethesda is on the same level as Nintendo?

So you agree with my overall point that Nintendo is not the best.

Its all opinions. They cant be the best in a genre theyve never made. Some people probably dont think Bethesda is the best at open world games...

Conditioned and Forced are two different things. You are the one twisting.  Force is something that is immediate while conditioned is acceptance over a long period of time. Im in no way saying that Nintendo forced consumers to buy their products.  

Im sure over the past 25+ years buyers of Nintendo products have accepted Nintendo's high level of quality and polish and that over the same period 3rd parties have not given them that, so it only makes sense that their software would rise over that of others and turn their consoles into "Nintendo games for Nintendo systems".  Sony has promoted its massive library over their own offerings, and while their offerings sell well, its not surprising to see 3rd parties top their list.

And correct we know that candy crush is over what, 300 million sold/downloaded, quality title right there.

Of course, which is why nobody is overall the best of the best.

Someone is always better at something than someone else.

Yes. So why are we arguing over something we agree on?lol

None of them.

How many times must I say this?

To be the best of the best you must outperform all adversaries. Nintendo DOES NOT do this.

So it's impossible for anyone to be the best of the best?