By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - We May See Multiplayer Zelda On Wii U, Says Aonuma

 

Would you like to see multiplayer?

Yes 52 51.49%
 
No 49 48.51%
 
Total:101
Max King of the Wild on 22 June 2014
MohammadBadir said:
Max King of the Wild said:
sc94597 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Haven't read the article but if true that means nintendo will just be destroying another franchise.

I never take such ridiculously negative posts seriously. Which franchises has Nintendo "destroyed?"


Where in my post did i say it was only nintendo who destroyed the other franchises? I just said they will be destroying another one. And they will be. Nintendo doesn't do online multi-player well and Zelda is a single player game. It will end badly 

The word "Another" implies they destroyed one in the past, I suggest you re-evaluate your grammar skills.

And how exactly is adding multiplayer to Zelda = destroying the franchise? The single player aspect will remain the same.

There was multiplayer in several past Zelda games, and they did not destroy the franchise, did they?


Another implies another game that will be destroyed lol. Nice try. As for an example, resident evil 5 anyone?



Around the Network
freebs2 on 22 June 2014

Well Zelda Battle Quest in NintendoLand was very good, maybe some asimmetric co-op multiplayer ?



Mystro-Sama on 22 June 2014

People don't even realise that there was multiplayer back in WW and that worked fantastic.



Frogger on 22 June 2014

Aonuma's idea of multiplayer is the Tingle bottle. Relax.



burninmylight on 22 June 2014
t3mporary_126 said:
TM25 said:
A waste of development time and resources if true, unless it is some four swords like spin-off.


Yes a four swords isometric diablo-esque multiplayer!!! Make it happen Nintendo!

That actually sounds like a great idea. To expand upon it, anyone with the Gamepad or with a 3DS can have their own screen and branch off from the party.



Around the Network
freebs2 on 22 June 2014
Max King of the Wild said:
MohammadBadir said:
Max King of the Wild said:
sc94597 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Haven't read the article but if true that means nintendo will just be destroying another franchise.

I never take such ridiculously negative posts seriously. Which franchises has Nintendo "destroyed?"


Where in my post did i say it was only nintendo who destroyed the other franchises? I just said they will be destroying another one. And they will be. Nintendo doesn't do online multi-player well and Zelda is a single player game. It will end badly 

The word "Another" implies they destroyed one in the past, I suggest you re-evaluate your grammar skills.

And how exactly is adding multiplayer to Zelda = destroying the franchise? The single player aspect will remain the same.

There was multiplayer in several past Zelda games, and they did not destroy the franchise, did they?


Another implies another game that will be destroyed lol. Nice try. As for an example, resident evil 5 anyone?

I've haven't played it online but on local Re5 mulitplayer was nice. The real problems of the game were elsewhere imo: a very plain game design (compared to its predecessor), the lack of any horror climate, also it was terribly short.



irstupid on 22 June 2014

I'm guessing something similar to Phantom Hourglass. Or Wind Waker when you went to dungeons with the new sages.

A second player can control said second character instead of Link having to switch between them.



MoHasanie on 22 June 2014

Interesting. I'm actually kinda interested in this and will definitely try playing the game with another person.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

burninmylight on 22 June 2014
MohammadBadir said:
Max King of the Wild said:
sc94597 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Haven't read the article but if true that means nintendo will just be destroying another franchise.

I never take such ridiculously negative posts seriously. Which franchises has Nintendo "destroyed?"


Where in my post did i say it was only nintendo who destroyed the other franchises? I just said they will be destroying another one. And they will be. Nintendo doesn't do online multi-player well and Zelda is a single player game. It will end badly 

The word "Another" implies they destroyed one in the past, I suggest you re-evaluate your grammar skills.

And how exactly is adding multiplayer to Zelda = destroying the franchise? The single player aspect will remain the same.

There was multiplayer in several past Zelda games, and they did not destroy the franchise, did they?


This guy once tried to make the argument to me that a business card is a valid form of ID, and the Gamestop manager who gave out a guy's personal info and dissed him in front of a crowd didn't deserve punishment. You're talking to a brick wall, dude.



Max King of the Wild on 22 June 2014
freebs2 said:

I've haven't played it online but on local Re5 mulitplayer was nice. The real problems of the game were elsewhere imo: a very plain game design (compared to its predecessor), the lack of any horror climate, also it was terribly short.


I played that game local with a friend over two days. Nice is generous way of putting it. I wouldn't describe it as good but it was enjoyable. Still, that game wasn't meant for multiplayer. Just like Zelda or GoW.