God knows what you were playing. Weabo games??? Appart from Vice City Stories, I don't think I spent more than 20 mins on a single game.

As for PSV, well, just look at the hardware sales and there's you proof. You know your in trouble when a port of a 2 year old game is needed to spark interest. (and constant ''redesigns''. 

Fixed.

This right here is correct though.  Each and every Playstation console at launch has a very limited amount of exclusives *edit* worth playing * for a good two or three years.  The PSP is the only exception, because even though it had a lot of ports, it also had a lot of third party exclusives(some of those were ports but Japanese only PC releases so still new to us.)  I state this time and time again, but Sony's got this complacent attitude in which they feel everyone is going to just support them, publisher and gamer alike.

Nintendo has no problem releasing several games at launch side by side with many 3DS games as well.  Between the amount of titles moneyhatted and Nintendo's own releases there's 19 Wii U titles released in the first 1.11 years.  Compare that to the PS4 which will have six exclusives by the end of 1.11 years.  If Sony doesn't want people to complain about them having no games, they need to either have a reasonable amount of exclusives the first year(I'd say atleast 10 or more,) and if they can't do that, do what other publishers do and pay for third parties to develop a few exclusives.

Gilga, pls. Don't even try to act like Haze wasn't hyped.

But that is what exactly happens... I cant think of a single PS3 game that went undernoticed, even Beyond and Allstars went on to do fair enough business. If anything, I expect Sony to produce exclusive after exclusive with all the fans and first party support they have accumulated over three whole generations. 

You are the one who failed to grasp the concept of my post. Whether there are critically acclaimed games for a system or not, anyone can say "but it has no games". "What do you mean by no games", you may ask. "No games that interest me". With this excuse you can make any claim you want. Do you get it now?

Warhawk, MGS4, Uncharted, SOCOM, GTA4, and Killzone 2 were all games that I really enjoyed last gen.

This just gets more asinine. What's with the militant ignorance against the PSP? Last time I checked the PSP had plenty of Western developed games. For your information "Weabo" titles account for a tiny fraction of my PSP collection.

Edit: Also, I'd like to know where you saw me defend the Vita as I made no mention of it.

I mean, lots of good quality games are coming out this fall.

You are clearly the individual having difficulty understanding. I challenged the statement that the PSP has no games because objectively we can see that there are plenty of games available for it. Therefore I have grounds to state otherwise. The aforementioned user didn't state that they didn't like the PSP, they simply stated that:

"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."

No qualifiers, no reasoning, nothing. This statement is indefensible because plenty of games, Western or Japanese, original and unique were released for the PSP throughout its lifetime and just because a user somehow has a preference against hundreds of titles doesn't mean that they suddenly don't exist. You can claim that it was inferior to the DS but you simply can not claim that there was nothing available for it, understand? You can not defend such an absolute, black and white statement that the PSP never receieved any quality games because it simply isn't true.

As a Vita owner and fan of Sony/all things Playstation I can safely say the the Vita indeed has zero games worth playing.