| naruball said: You are the one who failed to grasp the concept of my post. Whether there are critically acclaimed games for a system or not, anyone can say "but it has no games". "What do you mean by no games", you may ask. "No games that interest me". With this excuse you can make any claim you want. Do you get it now? |
You are clearly the individual having difficulty understanding. I challenged the statement that the PSP has no games because objectively we can see that there are plenty of games available for it. Therefore I have grounds to state otherwise. The aforementioned user didn't state that they didn't like the PSP, they simply stated that:
"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."
No qualifiers, no reasoning, nothing. This statement is indefensible because plenty of games, Western or Japanese, original and unique were released for the PSP throughout its lifetime and just because a user somehow has a preference against hundreds of titles doesn't mean that they suddenly don't exist. You can claim that it was inferior to the DS but you simply can not claim that there was nothing available for it, understand? You can not defend such an absolute, black and white statement that the PSP never receieved any quality games because it simply isn't true.
