By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony and Games

pbroy on 21 June 2014

Greatness awaits... In Sony we trust. ♥♥♥

VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER
Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
Around the Network
naruball on 21 June 2014
bouzane said:


You are clearly the individual having difficulty understanding. I challenged the statement that the PSP has no games because objectively we can see that there are plenty of games available for it. Therefore I have grounds to state otherwise. The aforementioned user didn't state that they didn't like the PSP, they simply stated that:

"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."

No qualifiers, no reasoning, nothing. This statement is indefensible because plenty of games, Western or Japanese, original and unique were released for the PSP throughout its lifetime and just because a user somehow has a preference against hundreds of titles doesn't mean that they suddenly don't exist. You can claim that it was inferior to the DS but you simply can not claim that there was nothing available for it, understand? You can not defend such an absolute, black and white statement that the PSP never receieved any quality games because it simply isn't true.


Dude! You still don't get it, do you? I'm not disagreeing with you on how good the psp was or that there should be no doubt that it did in fact have games. I know that, you know that, the critics and millions of people know that.

My point is: No matter how solid your arguments are and how baseless the other person's are, you're fighting a battle you cannot win. Why? Because you'll use facts like sales and critical acclaim and they'll say "those games were terrible". And you'll say "but what about the critics" and they'll say "they're all paid by companies", "but what about sales", they'll say "so what COD sells well". "I played x game and it was boring. I sold my psp/psvita/xbox/etc a month after I got it".

After you're done trying to argue with facts, you'll realize you'd be throwing eggs at a wall/wasting your time.

Lack of reasoning still doesn't prevent them from expressing their opinion no matter how little sense it makes.Technically, they can but they shouldn't.

Do you get what I'm saying now?



bouzane on 21 June 2014
naruball said:
bouzane said:
 


You are clearly the individual having difficulty understanding. I challenged the statement that the PSP has no games because objectively we can see that there are plenty of games available for it. Therefore I have grounds to state otherwise. The aforementioned user didn't state that they didn't like the PSP, they simply stated that:

"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."

No qualifiers, no reasoning, nothing. This statement is indefensible because plenty of games, Western or Japanese, original and unique were released for the PSP throughout its lifetime and just because a user somehow has a preference against hundreds of titles doesn't mean that they suddenly don't exist. You can claim that it was inferior to the DS but you simply can not claim that there was nothing available for it, understand? You can not defend such an absolute, black and white statement that the PSP never receieved any quality games because it simply isn't true.


Dude! You still don't get it, do you? I'm not disagreeing with you on how good the psp was or that there should be no doubt that it did in fact have games. I know that, you know that, the critics and millions of people know that.

My point is: No matter how solid your arguments are and how baseless the other person's are, you're fighting a battle you cannot win. Why? Because you'll use facts like sales and critical acclaim and they'll say "those games were terrible". And you'll say "but what about the critics" and they'll say "they're all paid by companies", "but what about sales", they'll say "so what COD sells well". "I played x game and it was boring. I sold my psp/psvita/xbox/etc a month after I got it".

After you're done trying to argue with facts, you'll realize you'd be throwing eggs at a wall/wasting your time.

Lack of reasoning still doesn't prevent them from expressing their opinion no matter how little sense it makes.Technically, they can but they shouldn't.

Do you get what I'm saying now?


I never had any problem understanding that it's personal opinion, I'm just saying that their opinion is asinine and can simply be dismissed as such. My point still stands that the statement...

"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."

...is frankly idiotic.

IE.

It is a black and white statement can be proven untrue, therefore I did. I don't know why you have to keep pointing out the fact that it is simply their opinion, I am fully aware of that fact. I am going to continue to ridicule it because it is impossible to support.



naruball on 21 June 2014
bouzane said:
naruball said:
 


Dude! You still don't get it, do you? I'm not disagreeing with you on how good the psp was or that there should be no doubt that it did in fact have games. I know that, you know that, the critics and millions of people know that.

My point is: No matter how solid your arguments are and how baseless the other person's are, you're fighting a battle you cannot win. Why? Because you'll use facts like sales and critical acclaim and they'll say "those games were terrible". And you'll say "but what about the critics" and they'll say "they're all paid by companies", "but what about sales", they'll say "so what COD sells well". "I played x game and it was boring. I sold my psp/psvita/xbox/etc a month after I got it".

After you're done trying to argue with facts, you'll realize you'd be throwing eggs at a wall/wasting your time.

Lack of reasoning still doesn't prevent them from expressing their opinion no matter how little sense it makes.Technically, they can but they shouldn't.

Do you get what I'm saying now?


I never had any problem understanding that it's personal opinion, I'm just saying that their opinion is asinine and can simply be dismissed as such. My point still stands that the statement...

"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."

...is frankly idiotic.

IE.

It is a black and white statement can be proven untrue, therefore I did. I don't know why you have to keep pointing out the fact that it is simply their opinion, I am fully aware of that fact. I am going to continue to ridicule it because it is impossible to support.


Ok, we keep agreeing on the same point that you keep making, so there's no point for me to keep trying to explain the same thing to you.

I end with this. My point was: use logic with someone who seems to be using logic themselves. When they make a statement that has nothing to do with reality trying to either argue with them or point out to them something factual, is a waste of your time. That is all.



bouzane on 21 June 2014

@naruball

I challenged the other user's statement, they didn't back it up with anything, and the whole thing was quick and painless. The only conversation that I felt that I wasted my time on today was the one that I had with you.



Around the Network
naruball on 21 June 2014

@bouzane
Good to know.



Gilgamesh on 22 June 2014
Teeqoz said:
Gilgamesh said:

So this always seems to be a reacuring thing every gen, PS has no games, PS2 has no games, PS3 has no games, PSP has no games, PS4 has no games, PSVita has no games.


Has people actually claimed that?

I meant in the beginning when it first launched.