Dude! You still don't get it, do you? I'm not disagreeing with you on how good the psp was or that there should be no doubt that it did in fact have games. I know that, you know that, the critics and millions of people know that.
My point is: No matter how solid your arguments are and how baseless the other person's are, you're fighting a battle you cannot win. Why? Because you'll use facts like sales and critical acclaim and they'll say "those games were terrible". And you'll say "but what about the critics" and they'll say "they're all paid by companies", "but what about sales", they'll say "so what COD sells well". "I played x game and it was boring. I sold my psp/psvita/xbox/etc a month after I got it".
After you're done trying to argue with facts, you'll realize you'd be throwing eggs at a wall/wasting your time.
Lack of reasoning still doesn't prevent them from expressing their opinion no matter how little sense it makes.Technically, they can but they shouldn't.
Do you get what I'm saying now?
I never had any problem understanding that it's personal opinion, I'm just saying that their opinion is asinine and can simply be dismissed as such. My point still stands that the statement...
"Every playstation portable console throughout lifetime = no games."
...is frankly idiotic.
IE.
It is a black and white statement can be proven untrue, therefore I did. I don't know why you have to keep pointing out the fact that it is simply their opinion, I am fully aware of that fact. I am going to continue to ridicule it because it is impossible to support.
Ok, we keep agreeing on the same point that you keep making, so there's no point for me to keep trying to explain the same thing to you.
I end with this. My point was: use logic with someone who seems to be using logic themselves. When they make a statement that has nothing to do with reality trying to either argue with them or point out to them something factual, is a waste of your time. That is all.
