No the X1 is not selling very well.  People need to be honest about its sales.  

Yes the flagships, as if PS4 does not have its own and more of them.  

The answers why we shouldn't, should be obvious. This is a profitable part of Microsoft, a company with almost limitless resources. Why would a profitable product, on decent track, by a AAA company be counted out? The X1 is in a way better position than the PS3 was. It was a company who's stock had been in freefall for years, was in the red constantly, and was billions in the hole as a product, and receiving similar poor sales. It recovered from a much worse position than the X1 is in at present. Especially since MS could absolutely afford to tank the price, if necessary to keep the brand alive. Sony would have a tough time following suit. 

Bolded is not true, and is a complete exaggeration of the point.

MS wanted to give gamers what they wanted, but only in the way MS saw profit to be made.

There was no reason to tie digital to MS ownership. There was no reason to require MS to be paid for trade-ins at gamestop for used games. It would only increase consumer costs, or hurt gamestop.

I dont think MS was getting paid just the game devs. Publishers have been bitching about used sales forever and this was MS's anwser. Publishers loved the old X1 ecosystem.

Fact: There was NO way to trade your disc-based games, that you physically own on ebay or any other marketplace. MS got a cut of every used sale. Look it up. This isn't FUD. There was no reason for this.

They announced you can do a 1 time license transfer to friends, so you could theoritically sell them without anyone getting a cut

Fact: You couldn't play your disc-based games without an online checkin. A certain someone was even fired for mocking people about being always online. Yet somehow steam is able to allow offline play of digital games. Funny.

The reason is they wanted to do a all digital system, but not piss off retailers. This way there is still incentive for major retailers to carry XBone. The disks were merely install disks and each game would come with a licence key that you register to your account, like steam. The 24 hour check was so you dont install the game unplug from the internet, then sell the game(license) to gamestop

Fact: You could not play your disc game on a friend's xb1. There were literally arguments defending this saying "oh I'll just bring my xb1 to my friend's house, big deal". Or "I can if I log-in with my profile", yet if you let a friend borrow game A and you wanted to play game B, you physically could not play different games at the same time on different xb1s, because you could not use the same login at two places at once. It's like "*ring ring* Hey bill, it's me, I let you borrow halo, but I want to play fifa now, so can you please log out of my account. I'll text you when I'm done".

You can play your games on a friends X1 as long as your XBL was logged in on their console

Fact: The family share has literally NEVER EVER BEEN FULLY EXPLAINED. EVER. IN HISTORY.

There were no features that had to be done the way MS wanted to do them. MS just decided what the most profitable way was, and made all their decisions based on that. That's not a terrible way to make money, but it's also important to wonder whether a consumer will actually support that. They did not.

MS's goal was to push the all digitial future that publishers/(some)devs want. They didnt want to sever ties with big box giants like Walmart so(some madman) tried creating some sort of digital/physical hybrid. If MS announced an all digital system all the big sellers would not sell the hardware because the money profit in the gaming industry has always been in software sales. MS was trying to balance customers, retailers and resellers all while keeping games in a digital enviroment. It is a bad idea, hopefully never to be seen or heard of again. If steam tried this shit Im sure they would not get the flack MS gets. They just dont let you resell games at all.

It took the PS3 18 months to hit the sales the X1 is at in under a year.

http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_Seventh_generation

It's start isn't spectacular like the PS4, but it's doing just fine. It's low this week, but it's the  week before an announced price cut. Remember PS3's sales leading up to the slim?

THe 3ds Is what half as strong as the Vita? Who cares. Quantity> Quality. Most Vgchartz members believe that MS exclusives will outsell Sonys exclusives this holidays and thats what matters. Having good games will turn it around which they have shown in MCC, FH2, Sunset Overdrive, Quantum Break , Gears and Halo

It took the PS3 18 months to hit the sales the X1 is at in under a year.

http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_Seventh_generation

It's start isn't spectacular like the PS4, but it's doing just fine. It's low this week, but it's the  week before an announced price cut. Remember PS3's sales leading up to the slim?