go tell that to nintendo then, since they basically did the same thing with smash. 

go back to the "x people take x hours to build a wall" example and think a little.

and thankfull is the last thing one should be in this situation.

Yes, Nintendo shafted Nintendo gamers in favor of Nintendo gamers. Which means that some gamers are envious of themselves, because they get to play Super Smash Bros. much earlier than themselves. Plus there's no doubt that the version that will release later will be the superior one.

So basically the same, yes. You sheep.

I see, so now we have the REAL answers.

How many months were the Wii U developers specifically borrowed for? Answer - You don't know.

Where is the source showing that all versions would have been finished around June or July if they'd just been left to get on with it? - Answer - In your own imagination.

Did you read or understand any of the links I gave you? - In the absence of an answer, I will assume you did not.

You have based your argument on arbitary figures and timeframes which you yourself have invented, and have refused to divulge, here. You have then gone on to use this fabrication to flame a company and accuse them of purposefully disrespecting Nintendo customers for making a decision which was the best that they could do in the circumstances.

You have demonstrated in these past few posts that you have not even wanted to understand the bigger picture, even when it is set out right in front of you.  Everywhere I look, you're arguing this subject with no facts to back them up, and nothing anyone else on this forum seems to say about it makes you want to change your mind.

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion, of course. But opinion is all it is, based on nothing more than your own rage, and it's getting old.

There's a saying. You can't please all of the people all of the time. And that is the case with Ubisoft here. Get over it.

I see, so now we have the REAL answers.

How many months were the Wii U developers specifically borrowed for? Answer - You don't know.

Where is the source showing that all versions would have been finished around June or July if they'd just been left to get on with it? - Answer - In your own imagination.

Did you read or understand any of the links I gave you? - In the absence of an answer, I will assume you did not.

You have based your argument on arbitary figures and timeframes which you yourself invented, and have refused to divulge here. You have then gone on to use this fabrication to flame a company and accuse them of purposefully disrespecting Nintendo customers by making a decision which was the best that they could do in the circumstances.

You have demonstrated in these past few posts that you have not even wanted to understand the bigger picture, even when it is set out right in front of you.  Everywhere I look, you're arguing this subject with no facts to back it up; nothing anyone else on this forum seems to say about it makes you want to change your mind.

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion, of course. But opinion is all it is, based on nothing more than your own rage, and it's getting old.

There's a saying. You can't please all of the people all of the time. And that is the case with Ubisoft here. Get over it.

bolded: releasing everything at the same time would please everyone. get over it and stop defending this inexcusable move.

I see, so now we have the REAL answers.

How many months were the Wii U developers specifically borrowed for? Answer - You don't know.

Where is the source showing that all versions would have been finished around June or July if they'd just been left to get on with it? - Answer - In your own imagination.

Did you read or understand any of the links I gave you? - In the absence of an answer, I will assume you did not.

You have based your argument on arbitary figures and timeframes which you yourself invented, and have refused to divulge here. You have then gone on to use this fabrication to flame a company and accuse them of purposefully disrespecting Nintendo customers by making a decision which was the best that they could do in the circumstances.

You have demonstrated in these past few posts that you have not even wanted to understand the bigger picture, even when it is set out right in front of you.  Everywhere I look, you're arguing this subject with no facts to back it up; nothing anyone else on this forum seems to say about it makes you want to change your mind.

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion, of course. But opinion is all it is, based on nothing more than your own rage, and it's getting old.

There's a saying. You can't please all of the people all of the time. And that is the case with Ubisoft here. Get over it.