I agree w you 100%     IF it was not for Ubi the Wii U library would have no diversity and the droughts would have been even worse-

I don t understand why any Wii U owner would critisize Ubisoft as they have been supporting the Wii U (and losing money doing so i am sure) when most 3rd party Devs have not at all-    IMO Ubi has supported the Wii u every bit as much as Nintendo to date

I am going to buy it-  and why on earth would you insult one of the only 3rd party deves that has supported the Wi U?

Even Nintendo chose to release Smash Bros on the 3DS ahead of the Wiii U -  why isn t it logical for a 3rd party to do the same? 

Oh nice, I think that's a good time. I'm looking forward to it. I hope it is not later or Ubisoft cancels it.

And come on guys, you know that a 28th May release would be stupid on the Wii U^^

what's the difference between what I said and stuff like: 6 people take 1 day to build a wall, how long would 9 people take to build the same wall?

other versions of watch dogs will release in may because they are using wii u's resources. without then, they would release slightly later, with the wii u version simultaneously.

Forget this game, I've lost interest.

go tell that to nintendo then, since they basically did the same thing with smash. 

*Has a strange sense of deja-vu*

OK, so you're saying that if they left the Wii U developers doing what they're doing, they could have had it finished by June or July, and the other versions would have been delayed until June or July so everything is released at the same time. So you claim that the Wii U version would have been done in an extra 2 months.

So can you explain how borrowing the Wii U developers for 2 months increases the Wii U versions dev time for another 6 months until the autumn? 

That doesn't make sense.

Why would Ubi risk announcing a SECOND delay for ALL versions, especially since the first delay announcement was so damaging? Source

(Edited to add) QUOTE Zero999 - "other versions of watch dogs will release in may because they are using wii u's resources. without then, they would release slightly later, with the wii u version simultaneously."

And how did you calculate that the Wii U version was only 1 to 2 months away from completion anyway?

Where's your source on that?

Wait, this is going to launch 6 months after the PC/PSONE/PS360 versions and at the same time that Smash Bros???
Damn, you'd think they learned something from their Rayman launching at the same tima that GTA V, but doesn't look so...
Just don't complain when it sells 10k Ubisoft.

I plan to get it, but their timing is just awful

it's not a delay if you never give a specific date and it wouldn't be for any version in particular, they'd simply be ready at about the same time. you can't say it would be the worst selling version unless you have a crystal ball and it's still a petty excuse to the inexcusable. they turned a version that could sell very well into a version that will sell like shit, pissed a lot of people (again) and didn't get anything in return.

it was wrong and disgusting for them, there's no way to justify ubisoft's move.

Current third party sales on PS4, XB1, 360, PS3 and WiiU show us exactly how each sku would sell.

WiiU would have sold the least and therefore isn't a priority. This is going to be their new big franchise this gen, they need to make sure it debuts as smoothly as possible on XB1 and PS4 especially, those are going to be the platforms the sequels sell 4m+ on like AC ect, not a couple hundred k like AC and other third party games have done on WiiU.