Gears of War. I was hoping Microsoft would come up with something more original than another SyFy shooter since they already had Halo to be the 360's flagship title.

• Fallout 3
• Uncharted franchise (except 2)
• Assassins Creed franchise (need to play 4)
• Halo franchise (good mp but crap sp)
• Zelda franchise (including OoT)
• Mario franchise
• Pokemon franchise
• Anthing Nintendo tbh
• Anything Japanese 
• GTA franchise (need to play 5)
• Killzone franchise
• Infamous franchise
• Call of Duty franchise
• Battlefield franchise
• Sports games
• Metal Gear Solid franchise
• Minecraft

Too many games to list. So I'll just mention franchises that I've played but didn't find them that appealing to me.

Elder Scrolls
Fable
GTA
Killzone
Halo

I don´t like GTA V and Call of Duty Ghosts. Ok, they´re gorgeous and big and all, but for me they are just.... boring.

League of legends and every other moba.

Despite liking RPG's, there a quite a few big ones I was never a big fan of. Final Fantasy 7 felt like a step down from the SNES games and only added some quickly dated cutscenes (seriously, they looked bad by the early PS2 era) and Skyrim felt dull compared to Fallout: New Vegas (though I still need to give SKyrim more time before completely writiing it off).

I like Ocarina of Time, but feel the rest of the 3D Zelda series is a tad overrated. I prefer A Link to the Past and A Link Between Worlds to Wind Waker and Twilight Princess. The latter games were designed in a way that made you feel like it took forever to progress, compared to the frequent encouragement of, say, LBW, where you could easily accomplish major things every half an hour.

I think the newer Mario games are generally better than their older equivalents. I haven't played enough of SMB3 to judge it fairly (I want time and energy to study it in depth), but I prefer the "New" subseries to the original SMB and World, and I prefer Galaxy and 3D World to Super Mario 64.

Braid. I understand that game was a turning point in indie games being treated seriously, and I appreciate the final sequence in particular, but overall I thought it was a dull game with repetitive puzzles despite its brevity that suffered from hubris.

I think God of War has good combat, great bosses, and an interesting art direction, but find the puzzle solving and platforming to be simple at best and distracting at worst. I never liked the stories they told either. Also, Kratos is overrated as a character.

I also dislike most fighting games. I should not have to memorize a list of input combinations in order to figure out how to do cool stuff. Smash Bros did it right in 1999, sacrificing a bit of depth for a metric ton of transparency, and due to its platforming elements, items, and complex stages, was never too simple anyway. Why can't the "serious" fighting games take a cue from Smash Bros?

I personally divide the Resident Evil series into three parts: the games that play like garbage and are cheesy, the games that forgo their horror roots and are cheesy, and the games like RE4 and Revelations that actually find a comfy cheesy middle-ground. Cheese is seemingly inevitable. Problem is, most of the series falls under the first two categories.

Well, that's enough for now. A mob appears to have mobilized outside my door, and I can't keep them waiting.

COD
Uncharted
TLOU
GofW
GOW
DK
StarFox

And big list...

Resident Evil - The entire franchise except 4, to which I'm merely indifferent.
Gears of War - The entire franchise.
Grand Theft Auto - All but Vice City, Chinatown Wars, and possibly V.

Every Gears of War after the 1st.

1st one was great.

Gears of war
Titanfall
Call of Duty
Assassin's Creed