Or, you know, you could release a new title in the series, say, every two years, and keep it going for a much longer time with no worries of fans losing interest.

Exactly, Ubisoft! Why don't you start releasing two AC games every year? Nothing could possibly go wrong! Nothing!

Why would you lose interest if the games are the same whether you release it every year or 2 years. they simply put twice as many people on the game

I 100% agree. People who don't probaby don't know assasins creed. People need to understand that with some franchises they can't bring something completely new. AC is going to remain AC, same for cod. BF took 2 years, for what? Bf4 ressembles bf3 a lot. Theyre never going to invest to remake something crazy with AC because its basics have been set and they're not going to make it become an mmorpg. Time doesnt always define quality, cod for exemple, it is some reskinned stuff in a way. But people who like cod think its great. No its not going to become a totally different game. But people who like it wi ll enjoy it. AC4 was a 1 year dev cycle too but had the most innovative stuff with the naval fighting. It really would be stupid to not release it yearly, as it would not get really better and fans would forget about it.

I have grown bored of AC now, but if it helps funds new IPs like The Division and The Crew and maybe even old IPs like Beyond Good & Evil, then I'm ok with it.

Every game went down with the console launch

I'm fine with 1 game a year as long as the quality is good. However, 2 is always too much, always!

Well, thats another yearly game added to the ever growing list of the so called "rehashes."

Well, I guess that's fine so long as the quality is maintained. Can they do that? This I am not sure, but let's at least give them a chance.

As if we didn't see this coming...

I'm obviously not their target audience then.

By that logic, Grand Theft Auto should be a yearly release.