Sin and punishment isnt a new IP though but i get your point.

Wonderful 101 wasn't solely developed in house by Nintnedo. He's talking about games that are developed ONLY by them.

The issue with Titanfall, for one thing, is that, big surprise, in case you hadn't noticed, with Xbox fans FPS games are their bread and butter. Hence the reason that, for the most part, FPS games are the highest selling Xbox/360 games of all time. So it's kind of a no-brainer that Titanfall is doing well on Xbox, just as Destiny will, because A) it's FPS, and B) it's made by the makers of Halo. It also doesn't hurt that gamers knew that TF was being developed by former Call of Duty guys. And it had tons of hype. And it's the first BIG exclusive for the system. So naturally, all of that combined together is bound to = sales.



Also, it's worth pointing out that:
Pikmin, Chibi Robo, Eternal Darkness, Elite Beat Agents, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Wii Sports (Wii ____ series), Xenoblade, technically The Last Story (they helped finance it, and published it in Japan), Animal Crossing (started as an N64 game in Japan but got introduced to the rest of the world on GC), similar story with Sin & Punishment (which we didn't get on N64, but received a Wii sequel), Electroplankton, Steel Diver, Disaster: Day of Crisis (retardedly not brought to NA), Endless Ocean, (technically) the Professor Layton games, Drill Dozer, Harmo-Knight, Rhythm Heaven, Fluidity, Fling-Smash, Dillon's Rolling Western, Pandora's Tower (similar situation to The Last Story), Nintendo Land, The Wonderful 101, and the upcoming "X".

Just to name a few of the IPs NIntendo has rolled along since the N64 days. They haven't exactly been sitting on their hands in that department. It's just that, as I said, sequels sell.



@prayformojo

The problem with that is, if games not specifically developed by Nintendo in-house somehow don't count, then neither do all of the Sony and MS published games that THEY did not themselves develop in-house. Pull that card, and suddenly Sony and MS don't have a hell of a lot of IPs on their systems, do they? Of course Nintendo makes far more in-house software than Sony or MS ever do, because they are and have been a games company for decades. Sony and MS are not games companies.

But regardless, if we're going to include Sony or MS published games like Uncharted, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, God of War, Gears of War, Halo, Resistance, Infamous, Sly Cooper, Project Gotham Racing, Kinect Sports, "Killer Instinct", etc. etc. etc. etc., then it's only fair to also include Nintendo funded/published games as well, which is why I listed them above. They still count as "NIntendo franchises/IPs".

to be fair, Ninty did make some IPs especially last gen, but the only ones that really seemed to have an impact was Wiiseries on consoles...and yeah thats about it. Stuff like endless ocean didnt really do much and the WIi Series is not new IP, they havent really replaced that with the new it series. Thats a contrast to Sony, and MS they didnt have super duper selling franchises like WIiSeries but the stuff they did put out sold well enough, Motorstorm, Resistance, Uncharted, Gears and not to mention all the new IPs 3rd parties put out that never saw the light on Wii and probably wont see the light on Wii U. Of course Ninty is not going to look hot by comparison, but watcha gonna do?

you mean the RE4 game that got annouced as getting a PS2 version shortly after. The remake of a game that people already played. Or zero which was just ok

RE4 did pretty well on Gamecube, but that wasn't a new IP. It was an established series that had the majority fanbase on a different platform. It was also hurt by the PS2 version being announced before the Gamecube version was even released. And if Nintendo's competitors are smearing it's name then maybe Nintendo should try that too. People loved it when Sony attacked Microsoft at E3. 

It needs new IP's but the solution is not making a FPS like Call of Duty or a Cinematic game like Uncharted. They need to make new IP's that go in line with what they where doing for years. "Mature games" aren't the solution to Nintendo's problems.

Id like some more "adulty" games from Nintendo.

I'm saying Nintendo should try to appeal to different crowds. Mature games is just one example. Get inspiration from popular games but make it unique. 

Agree with this. They really made some excellent new ip's during previous gen. Stuff like Brain Age, Nintendogs, Wii Sports/Fit were just so different from what their competition offered.