Sure why not?

LIES!

You know you want Knack in VR.

Since Nintendo isn't the one herding the soccer moms this time, I doubt I'll be using it. However, I doubt I'd use it anyway. I don't know if I want to put something the size of a brick over my eyes and look even more dumb than waggling a Wii remote.

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said: Only for PCs cause just think of all the Porn! Or better yet, I bet someone will make a mod or a game where you can have virtual Sex with celebrities! Just think, virtual sex with Jennifer Lawrence And/Or Emma Watson! Could be the greatest invention since the beginning of man kind if done right!

This is a great idea, even if you are joking a little.

I always wanted to look like a moron while playing games, so why not?!

If it doesnt involve stick waving and arm flailing, sure

I think if used by a singular person, it might be successful. But I don't think it will have breakout success for gaming in general because it lacks the group fun of playing video games. If I have my friends over to play games and one of us straps on (for lack of a better phrase) a headset, one person is enjoying the device, kind of like the Wii U tablet. They have to figure out a way to create that arcade feel of people gathering around a cabinet and having a good time, or Wii feel of people waving their hands around together and laughing. Then it will be a success.

Either way, I doubt I'll buy in to it though.

I could be wrong. Which I've been known for in the past.

I think it can be really amazing, like, life destroying amazing, like crack cocaine levels of addiction.

if the price is right

It's funny how people are worried about how the "popularity" of local multiplayer would negatively impact the potential appeal of VR when games have been phasing out local multiplayer in favor of going all-online for the past gen anyway. Local multiplayer for first-person games (which are the only ones that make sense for VR) is half-dead already.