Also, one last point. I don't understand how the metric for design was given a 5.
You said dungeon was 40% of the game. That would mean you gave the entire combat portion of the game a 0, or, you gave the 60% of the game a 3/10, and the dungeon a 2/10 or some distribution of which.
ie: if the dungeon is half the design, and you gave the design a 5, then you must have given the dungeon an extremely poor score.

EDIT: This is not to say the dungeon is particularly great. It's fair, at best. The combat is entertaining, the bosses are cool, and they fit in with the story and character unlocks. I must say that the dungeon significantly improves the game. While not ideal, the dungeon is a benefit, not a detriment to the game, but the scoring seems to suggest that it is. While you may argue that 0 simply means it didn't earn any points, you can't say that the game would be better without the dungeons....which logically means it must be worth something 

What you point out as incorrect or misleading information isn't.  I stated limited amount of time, and you do.  I started off with pointing out that you have a single year in Inaba and you have a limited amount of time between events.  My explaining of social links covered pretty much all of what your reply stated.

First off, "Each day you have at most two different times to increase these statistics. so there's a lot of time management involved."  That's in the third paragraph.  "and then increasing social skills during the afternoon and evening" and that's in the second paragraph.  So that really complete negates your whole comment about time limit actually being about time. 

About social links you're stating a lot that I've already said.  In the second paragraph, "Each character in the game had a unique personality, which while going through the game you're frequently given multiple choices as to how you'd like to respond and the characters may like you more depending on your answer." this was during the second paragraph, so there's really no need to repeat myself by saying the same thing or something similar when talking about social links. 

The third paragraph talks about everything else you're listing that I didn't include.  "Social skills are different statistics like courage, knowledge, etc, where a required level might be required to take jobs, talk to people at certain times, or even choose a certain response.  It's not required, but having a high social link with multiple characters and fusing monsters will make dungeons much easier.  You can increase social links and social skills by doing different jobs, different activities, and spending the day with the characters."  I just didn't make a long list of everything you could do to increase social links and social skills.  It's to the point and it also lets the player find out what increases what.  This is a review, not a strategy guide.

I made mention of the quests in combat, but you're right.  I did not make specifically state that you could catch bugs, buy items, and do quests without wasting your afternoon or evening.  I also didn't make the comment that you could buy weapons and armor either.  See, that's where I feel common sense should take place.  I don't think I should have to tell someone something obvious.  I mean.  Do I also need to say that you waste time talking to a random NPC?   No.  It's a given.  Although catching bugs is the only thing not obvious as you'd assume it'd take up your time since it asks if you want to catch bugs, the only time where doing an activity doesn't waste time.

Last.  My review isn't to theorize the reader as a person and how they are.  I did describe everything you pointed out though and made it clear in the review that these are major aspects of the game.  The storyline would have characters like you more depending on your answer, that you could have deeper relationships with characters by doing social links, gaining more insight on their feelings and problems, etc.  And on the final paragraph, I even pointed out that the game is quite a bit more story focused than gameplay.  I didn't mention it, but it's about 60/40 more focused on story.

You don't seem to really represent the game. ie; No mention of the 100+ different personas.

"at most two different times to increase these statistics".... but that's not true, since it's often 3, with one being school activities or lunchtime.

Your explanation of time duration and S-Links really aren't ideal. You say it's not a strategy guide, but you spend a whole paragrpah on something as inconsequential as Sweep bonus. Not to mention that there are characters you cannot talk to until a a second playthrough.

It's like you spend time talking about trivialities and listing things, but don't really paint a good picture.

Your opinion is your opinion. 

There are some things I felt could be left out for the player  to learn.  For example, lunchtime activities as you're stating here.  The lunchtime activity is a bonus from making food in the evening.  Don't make food in the evening, don't get the lunchtime activity.  So yes.  It's two times a day, as lunchtime is only an extension of what you do in the evening where you delay your bonus. 

Each character only has one persona, the main character gets multiple personas which he can fuse together.  I gave the player how the gameplay plays with each persona, how fusing personas can gain extra experience for the new one, etc.  It's obvious there are a lot of different personas if while I'm explaining the shuffle time and sweep option, where you have the possibility of gaining them each battle.  The game doesn't even explain getting a sweep, to make it easier to get more cards after each battle so it was more informative than the game.

There are also things in that battle system I didn't explain because I simply forgot to mention them.  The game has five skills that state "Inflicts a small amount of Physical damage on one enemy." but gives no explanation on whether or not this specific one has low hit percentage, high critical percentage, etc.  Nothing that you can tell that a skill like single shot is better than a skill like skewer.  Doesn't state the power it has, anything.  Simply that one statement.  I didn't explain that because I forgot, but it's another cause of the games bad design.  Wouldn't have made me reduce the score even further, but it's a problem with the game. 

The above paragraph is far more important than giving detail that you sometimes can do a third activity, but only by wasting one activity during night time.  It's pointless to even reference that, it does nothing to extend the value or devalue the game itself in the review.  It's something the player can easily find out on their own, something that they're not just going to happen to miss. 

I felt that the review detailed everything that was most important while leaving out stuff that the player can find out on their own.  Not write about each and every minor detail giving the player no satisfaction on finding anything out on their own.  Don't you think people want to figure out some of the game on their own?

I'll edit the review just for you though.  I'll go add a list of activies and exactly what they pertain to.  Drinking coffee allows you to get skill cards to teach personas, going to the movies levels up your characters personas and increases a couple extra skill points additional, you can buy and change clothes, etc, etc.  I hope you realize this is sarcasm.

And my Pokemon review was much more detailed your mock review.  I'm sure you were trying to be funny putting a 6/10 overall not realizing I gave it a lower score than that.